• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management Next Manager Poll (poll reset 11/04/23)

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Next Manager

  • Rodgers

    Votes: 15 3.6%
  • Potter

    Votes: 25 5.9%
  • Nagelsmann

    Votes: 177 41.9%
  • Kompany

    Votes: 43 10.2%
  • Slot

    Votes: 91 21.6%
  • Postecoglou

    Votes: 74 17.5%
  • De Zerbi

    Votes: 31 7.3%
  • Xabi Alonso

    Votes: 11 2.6%
  • Stellini

    Votes: 4 0.9%
  • Frank

    Votes: 10 2.4%
  • Luis Enrique

    Votes: 21 5.0%
  • Zidane

    Votes: 5 1.2%
  • Glasner

    Votes: 3 0.7%
  • Amorim

    Votes: 10 2.4%
  • Carrick

    Votes: 9 2.1%
  • Gallardo

    Votes: 23 5.5%
  • Schmidt

    Votes: 2 0.5%

  • Total voters
    422
Status
Not open for further replies.
There are lots of candidates though, which makes it a bit different from the Nuno summer. Plus despite what a lot of fans think it is a great job for someone to make a name for themselves as Poch showed. And that was when the club was seriously hampered by the stadium build. Any promising young manager worth his salt has to see it as a huge opportunity for themselves. I bet there has been a lot of interest from people.
Just because there are more candidates it doesn't mean they are interested in the job. This board is toxic and I think it's the main reason why managers would be reluctant to come here. There is a whole history of them screwing over every single manager they've had.
 
Just because there are more candidates it doesn't mean they are interested in the job. This board is toxic and I think it's the main reason why managers would be reluctant to come here. There is a whole history of them screwing over every single manager they've had.

100% and it will happen to the next bloke and the next and the next, until ENIC go. But the job is still very attractive to a lot of top managers and that is before they even look at the salary they can get.
 
Only two of us would like to welcome back Carrick?? 🤯

A young, so far impressive coach who could build a new (and much needed)team/squad.

_41751342_carrick270.jpg
If he fancied being player manager he'd probably still improve our midfield too...
 
100% and it will happen to the next bloke and the next and the next, until ENIC go. But the job is still very attractive to a lot of top managers and that is before they even look at the salary they can get.
And let's be honest.

Managers getting "screwed over by the board" is not unique to Spurs. In fact it happens almost everywhere. We just focus on our own problems since we prefer talking about our own club. But you can bet money on there being similar discussions among fans of most clubs in Europe. Including at bigger ones (looking at you, Bayern and PSG).
 
And let's be honest.

Managers getting "screwed over by the board" is not unique to Spurs. In fact it happens almost everywhere. We just focus on our own problems since we prefer talking about our own club. But you can bet money on there being similar discussions among fans of most clubs in Europe. Including at bigger ones (looking at you, Bayern and PSG).
To a much lesser extent though tbf. Also it doesn't seem to impact other clubs ability to win trophies either, so I believe we are the the biggest problem re. our board screwing over our managers. Also how many managers has our board (read Levy and Cullen) sacked? What is it now 4 in the last 6 years including 3 of the best out there? Yes Chelsea are bad at that too, but they win plenty of trophies along the line, so it's obviously not impacting player morale like it does at Spurs. Rest assured we are a unique problem sadly.
 
Why try and follow Guardiola? It will be like trying to follow Ferguson, you will never meet the expectations they set. I think if he's clever he swerves that place until 2 or 3 managers have passed through and the standards have dropped. Plus they have the FFP allegations against them.
I wouldn't disagree but its rare for people to not take their chance. They either believe in themselves or they don't. Many have flown too close to the sun, and more will do so in the future...

Look at Gerrard, took the poisoned chalice that was the Villa job, now any chance of returning to Liverpool are gone. Kompany would be best suited staying with Burnley, little will be expected of them, if he keeps them up playing good football, with an identity, it will be seen as a success.

If he came to us, I think his youth and inexperience could work against him and the crowd would get on him sooner than a more proven manager.
 
I’m not always right and unlike you I don’t believe it’s possible to speak definitively. I am, however, led by reason and I am interested in context and that’s what I lead with. Facts and evidence matter.

People use the “9th richest club” stat to suggest we should be winning trophies in England. But we are the 5th richest club in England. And for most of ENIC’s ownership we’ve been the 6th richest club. We’re not competing for domestic trophies against teams in Germany or Spain who have less money - we’re competing against the very richest clubs in the world.

37 out of 40 trophies in the past decade have been won by teams with more resources than us.

The fact you can’t acknowledge that overwhelming statistic shows your bias.

The one criticism I would agree with you on is the Europa league and Conference league where we should have done better when we’ve been involved. We’ve underperformed in those competitions (we’ve often underperformed in domestic cups too when you look at who has knocked us out).

I have clearly stated the lack of a coherent and appropriate football strategy is a strong and valid critique of Levy. We agree on that.

But the FACTS are that we have overperformed relative to your resources in 10 out of the past 12 seasons. That is staggering overachievement. So while we are both frustrated, the results have been better than we should expect most seasons.

To focus on the 3 times in the past decade when a team with less resources has won a trophy shows how ridiculous your argument is.

A team with less resources than us has never won the league cup in the past decade.
A team with less resources than us has won the FA cup twice in the past decade.
A team with less resources than us had won the league once in the past decade.

The fact this happens so infrequently is all the evidence you need for how tough it is and how far the odds are stacked against us. The league win by Leicester was incredible at the time and everyone agreed it was a historically improbable event.

It’s a shame we haven’t had the luck needed to win a trophy over the past decade… and it’s true that two other teams have had that luck… but on average we have performed significantly better than both of those teams over the past decade. We just haven’t had that bit of luck needed.
It boggles the mind that this actually got not one, but two disagrees. It's factual statements with no opinion whatsoever!

Some people do truly live in a parallel universe.
 
Last edited:
It's not just working in a bigger league than Holland. Ten Hag had only worked in Holland, but unlike Slot, he'd been doing it for a sustained period of time, with a decent amount of success in the Europa and CL as well.
Compare that with the previous Dutchman to have a decent record in Holland to come to England.... Frank De Boer was doing well with Ajax for 5 years then completely failed at Palace, effectively ending his career.
FdB is a bad example. He had the crutch of the incredible Ajax setup that allowed him to succeed. All he had to do yo win the title in Holland was to not fuck up. If you look at his record in Europe, it was dismal. Slot, on the other hand, has done it with teams with significantly lesser resources and has managed to be successful both domestically and in Europe. You really can't put the two in the same category.
 
It boggles the mind that this actually got not one, but two disagrees. It's factual statements with no opinion whatsoever!

Some people do truly live in a parallel universe.
It was factually incorrect. Because 37 out of 40 trophies were not won by teams with more money than us. We were not in the CL in all those years. We were in the europa league and the conference league quite a few times and those were won by clubs with less money than us.

Your mind boggles too easily. Here's a cat DJ that will also boggle your mind.

Excited Saturday Morning GIF
 
Sceptical it’s true, but we’ve tried everything else, so why not. He left Anderlecht apparently because the owners wouldn’t back, him so if Levy thinks getting a young manager in, so he can control him, is the idea then I think he will be sorely mistaken.

I would be excited to see what he could do but it is obviously a big risk.
Pep would be a big risk with the BTEC Bean Counter still as Chairman. Doesn’t matter who we get with the bald miser at the helm, they will be sacked (the only variable is whether it takes 8 games or 18 months)
 
It was factually incorrect. Because 37 out of 40 trophies were not won by teams with more money than us. We were not in the CL in all those years. We were in the europa league and the conference league quite a few times and those were won by clubs with less money than us.

Your mind boggles too easily. Here's a cat DJ that will also boggle your mind.

Excited Saturday Morning GIF
The 37 of the 40 trophies LeParisien LeParisien was referring to were the domestic trophies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top