Surely missed a trick because of pennywise the clown & red balloons. Something to work with there.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Management Levy / ENIC
- Thread starter The Fighting Cock
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Worrying that you think levy would sell to a bad owner. Others suggest he has our best interests at heart :contelol:
We don't need to step back as far as relegation though. Absolutely no guarantees that leads us anywhere good.
Step back in terms of resetting, getting an actual game plan and squad to match it together (a project in other words), absolutely - which means accepting we won't be competing for trophies anytime soon.
So no - anyone who thinks relegation is the solution is, indeed, a nimblewimble.
Deal with it.
Zomb
you don't think anti semtism is vile? Strange stance for a spurs fan to take but that's your perogative I guess
I missed that. Saw one of Levy getting clumped amongst others
What did it say
It’s a hard reset though. Shite players like Perisic, Sanchez, Dier and PEH will all hang around for another year or two diluting any go forward project.
I also think it will be a more enjoyable fan experience for the match goers (for a season anyway) and cull the day trippers, neutrals and selfie Son fans
Everton’s finances are so the complete opposite of our stable platform. 100% different to us
But you think he doesn't have the club's best interest at heart, ergo he will sell to a bad owner.
So be as well keeping him?
Ok. I mean I do understand your point. I just don't think we need/want to go that extreme, personally.
But I'll politely agree to disagree, and accept you have some valid points.
But he loves the club so that wouldn't happen
I’d like a hard reset too but I’m not convinced relegation is the best method.
I've watched it a few times and I don't see anything anti semitic. What am I missing?
That's a pretty serious allegation you're making there. One that should be substantiated.
Wrong! My response. He doesn’t have the best interests of the club at heart, £££ is the biggest interest he has at heart. So he will sell to the biggest bidder.But you think he doesn't have the club's best interest at heart, ergo he will sell to a bad owner.
So be as well keeping him?
Now can you reply to mine rather than deflect? Do you think levy would sell to a bad owner? Yes or no please?
Five good reasons here. Though I can think of many, many more
Levy has five reasons to quit Tottenham and finally end nightmare
Levy has five reasons to quit Tottenham and finally end nightmare
Yes. So then I have to wonder will selling the club make things even worse.
Now we're getting somewhere, Jim...
But I can see this...the Poch years were awesome, getting up and knowing someone might be in for a drubbing, "your fucking shit", team of animals, etc etc. But I'd like to be clear of your position, or whichever you're arguing.
But I asked/my statement began...
But this also means that you think yours is the most fair criteria (as everybody does)...unless you are saying that you are a person walking around with knowledge of a more fair set of criteria that you are eschewing for whatever particular reason that I'm sure many would be interested to hear about...
But most importantly, according to YOUR criteria (which I stated in the post to which you replied), it is thus unfair criticism to levy the trophy-less decade on Levy/ENIC...because your criteria isn't based on trophy haul it is based on something we'll hopefully learn about in a subsequent post. And according to YOUR criteria is what I am asking...no one else's criteria matters here.
Not sure I can agree with that change being minor, Jim...
***I get that this point is followed by "according to THEIR criteria" later in the post. I'm just responding in flow of the post and not in any way attempting to mischaracterize your reply...that should be abundantly clear but sometimes...in situations like this...folks will look for any reason to escape...not suggesting you'd do that but just getting out ahead of anything.
No problem...like you said, it's a good thing to be able to restate/paraphrase another's point. Keeps everyone focused...Yes that's about right - and thanks for paraphrasing my reply, I appreciate that.
Minor, you say? Ok, let's have it...
To be clear, you "wouldn't say it's 'unfair' to criticize" Levy/ENIC based on the trophy-less decade?*** Ok, this is an interesting point...I'm interested to see where it goes, why, and under what conditions...but it stands to reason if someone doesn't find a particular line of criticism unfair then they'd agree with it...but we'll see...
...and again, to be clear, your criteria of success is what, exactly? We've beaten around that bush but we've never really speciated it. I think it would help if you clearly defined what your criteria for success is...I can surmise that it is not based on trophy haul (but I'd still want clarity and precision). And though we've reference league position and respective finals we've only attributed it to nebulous ENIC IN entity.
But I can see this...the Poch years were awesome, getting up and knowing someone might be in for a drubbing, "your fucking shit", team of animals, etc etc. But I'd like to be clear of your position, or whichever you're arguing.
But I asked/my statement began...
That is according to YOUR criteria...and since you utilize different criteria then by definition you believe any other criteria is less than optimal, unfair, wrong, etc etc etc...whatever the case may be but it's not the best. Right? That stands to reason. You, scarletjim, think the best/most fair set of criteria is your own...right? I'm not sure this is controversial because I believe everyone that has ever lived thinks their take is best.
But this also means that you think yours is the most fair criteria (as everybody does)...unless you are saying that you are a person walking around with knowledge of a more fair set of criteria that you are eschewing for whatever particular reason that I'm sure many would be interested to hear about...
But most importantly, according to YOUR criteria (which I stated in the post to which you replied), it is thus unfair criticism to levy the trophy-less decade on Levy/ENIC...because your criteria isn't based on trophy haul it is based on something we'll hopefully learn about in a subsequent post. And according to YOUR criteria is what I am asking...no one else's criteria matters here.
Not sure I can agree with that change being minor, Jim...
***I get that this point is followed by "according to THEIR criteria" later in the post. I'm just responding in flow of the post and not in any way attempting to mischaracterize your reply...that should be abundantly clear but sometimes...in situations like this...folks will look for any reason to escape...not suggesting you'd do that but just getting out ahead of anything.
Sorry, Jim...but I responded to the original and not this edit...didn't even know this edit existed...Yes that's about right - and thanks for paraphrasing my reply, I appreciate that.
Me neither but I don’t think it’s something to be terrified of and we have been so frugal we would withstand it 100%. We are in a cycle of average boredom. Who enjoyed last night? Boring as f
Maybe, maybe not. But unless you're more excited by Go Karts, Beyonce and NFL than winning trophies like we used to, I think it's worth rolling the dice and finding out.
Being one of the 10 richest clubs in the world means fuck all if you're not investing adequately in the football team.