If either of Galtier or Ancelotti come available those would be intriguing options.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
If either of Galtier or Ancelotti come available those would be intriguing options.
It's entirely possible Slot's agent was playing both Levy/Munn & Feyonoord.
The buyout for Slot was next summer, so it was irrelevant to our negotiations right now..
A week ago, Slot publicly said: "The next step will not be another club in Holland, if that is the next step and if I fail completely in the upcoming few years.
"The normal next step would be to go abroad and I've always said the best league in the world is the Premier League but when it comes to Italy you can see there are a few clubs playing in European finals now. There are more countries where it is interesting to go to in the future, but the Premier League is the biggest league in the world, that is clear."
So, if Slot was prepared to speak with forked tongue on the record, you can bet his agent was talking all kinds of shite off the record.
But it most definitely is relevant that Peak Poch had nothing to do with a DoF.I wasn't talking about the history of our club. I was talking about what conceptually is the case.
Last I checked, Ally Gold didn't work for the Mail.The whole Slot thing was a Daily Mail journo trying to keep the clicks up
The whole Slot thing was a Daily Mail journo trying to keep the clicks up
Something that, together with the fact that Munn is also Aussie, is completely irrelevant to our manager search.Ange also has connections to City Football Group as well, which is where Munn came from
Something that, together with the fact that Munn is also Aussie, is completely irrelevant.
As I said, the manager will deliver change and faster, but it will be short-lived. You just made my point with the Poch example. A DoF, one as good a DoF as Poch was a manager, will set foundations that will not allow that dip to happen and will ensure better continuity than the lurching from one manager to the other we have experienced the past 4 years. But these foundations take time to establish and bear fruits. A manager can turn things around faster, but when he leaves it all goes to pieces, if said foundations aren't there.But it most definitely is relevant that Peak Poch had nothing to do with a DoF.
All the players talk about how the culture was created by Poch, not by ownership or some DoF.
And the style of football was Poch's.
So the most successful, and the most thrilling, football of recent years was delivered by a Head Coach, not a DoF.
Poch doesn't much like DoFs and, according to the link I posted above, actively got Baldini binned. The questions arise because we had a season where we bought no one, because Poch didn't want the players Levy thought he could get. Then Poch insisted on signing Ndombele & GLC above Bruno Fernandes, and most of us think that was a catastrophic mistake, despite Bruno being a bellend.
Would having a DoF having changed that situation? I suspect not, because most top Head Coaches are very stubborn about which players they want.
Conte basically told Paratici who he wanted, and if the club delivered someone else, he froze them out - eg Spence & Danjuma.
So the theory of DoFs is fine. Our real world experience has been chaotic.
Legally they can't, but if it meant we nick the odd title off them, I certainly wouldn't mind!If he comes in does that mean CFG also want to buy a stake in Spurs?
Maybe we become a City Group feeder club.
That's the DoF theory.As I said, the manager will deliver change and faster, but it will be short-lived. You just made my point with the Poch example. A DoF, one as good a DoF as Poch was a manager, will set foundations that will not allow that dip to happen and will ensure better continuity than the lurching from one manager to the other we have experienced the past 4 years. But these foundations take time to establish and bear fruits. A manager can turn things around faster, but when he leaves it all goes to pieces, if said foundations aren't there.
PSG and, currently, Napoli are obviously more attractive targets than Tottenham.Not only Feyenoord, but is Enrique now choosing between Napoli or PSG over Spurs?
Or they just sell us Kyle Walker back for the same 50m to help them with FFPLegally they can't, but if it meant we nick the odd title off them, I certainly wouldn't mind!
Defendi.. Goalini.... ItalianoHiring someone actually called "Italiano" would definitely be doubling down, wouldn't it?
Because he knows Beale will turn hm over next year.Sure but if Levy is contributing towards managers avoiding the Spurs job, then his position is compromised. His additional problem now is that Conte called him/ENIC out, publicly.
I don't see why the Celtic manager would leave that job to come here?
It's not long now until the transfer market opens (10th June I think) and we don't even have a new DoF yet, so not only the issues with Levy but also a potential new manager won't even know who he's directly working under/with.
Heard he's going to be manager of young boys instead.When Philip Schofield turns us down on Monday it’s really gonna hit the fan.