TBF there is actually more money in football than before in terms of TV rights, sponsorship etc but yeh would be great to see a World without City, Chelsea and soon to be Newcastle doping. How much would fees drop would be interesting.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Tosin would be a good rotation player. Think he’s ok on both sides.
Geuhli isn’t worth his price tag imo. Not a good complement to Romaro either
#dealwithitWhat an uninformed statement. We don't invest the money we have for transfers and wages into karting and property. But the revenue from some of these commercial investments will add to the money we have for transfers and wages.
You complain about us not spending more on the football side, yet at the same time deride the commercial moves the club makes which will allow it to spend more on the football side.
The state of you guys...
Seems so obvious....Unfortunately means it's doomed.
It really is.
If Ange was able to deal with big Joe's distribution, maybe this guy would have some time to develop.
BIG problem would be the homegrown situation.
We would need at least 1 CB and the AM to 100% be homegrown if we got this guy instead of Raya.
Hate it when this happens in the window.
As a fan you can see what looks like the most logical and achievable outcome of the window, in this case Tapsoba and Tosin, it looks to be staring the club straight in the face....
Then Levy goes and gets Maguire and Lenglet.
Again, it makes so much sense...
Where did this ‘Deal with it!’ Thing come from?
Again, it makes so much sense...
![]()
Don't let Daniel know that we think it's a good idea.
Maybe we should tell him that we all really want Maguire and Lenglet.
Nah not enough cover imo. In that scenario id keep Rodon as well.
Nah not enough cover imo. In that scenario id keep Rodon as well.
As far as I can tell Rodon isn't even a Wimmer level player.I could live with it, but if it came to it I'd rather play Davies > Rodon anyway, so it would feel redundant much the same.
Davies can't play in a back 4 though. He'd get eaten alive playing in a 2 man CB partnership.I could live with it, but if it came to it I'd rather play Davies > Rodon anyway, so it would feel redundant much the same.