Yes. Loads of data pie charts were posted about Lenglet to show just how much better than Davies he was.
He was worse.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)
- Thread starter Fattynomates
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Yes. Loads of data pie charts were posted about Lenglet to show just how much better than Davies he was.
He was worse.
Nearly as good as Onana with his feet, especially his short and medium passing, which is what Ange wants. Taller than Raya, a year younger, and an incredible shot stopper. On the minus side, he's cheaper.
Can I ask how you know, serious question but are you a regular Empoli watcher?
to be fair one thing i will say in his favor is that not many knew maignan before going to milan for 12 mill
many are saying he was the second best in serie a after maignan that alone says something
many are saying he was the second best in serie a after maignan that alone says something
Of course he hasn’t. He basically judges players on if he’s good with them in FIFA.
No, but they depend on their valuations being more accurate than the market valuation. Brighton's scouts have proven they are good in that regard to be fair.
I'm not saying it's a perfect correlation, just that your bathroom renovation analogy doesn't work. It would be like if bathroom renovation prices were based on thousands of consumers being able to watch the company renovate bathrooms, and then deciding on a consensus.
when did I say he's shit you weirdo? I don't even know him.What do they know? Our resident goalkeeper expertsDeuterz
Doom Funk and
kingdawson have determined that he's a shit GK because he's cheaper than what would have been the 4th highest transfer fee ever paid for a GK. And for one that isn't even world class, has a year left on his contract, and whose team already signed his replacement.
What it looks like is that we identified our number one goalkeeper choice and then decided to go for the cheaper option when we couldn't strike a deal.
Sorry if I sound pessimistic but I've seen the same shit time and time again.
No.
All I see is a distended rectum amidst one of the less interesting constellations.
He is a better passer, but can't defend. I'd be surprised if the pie charts indicated that Lenglet was good defensively.
Whatever. The point is that it’s not a 1.00 correlation. So people have to at least watch a player before saying he’s automatically worse.
not at all, theres some players you know some you obiously dont
regarding him i dont know too much about him, i mean who does watch empoli and be honest
Please tell me this isn’t gonna be a Gollini Pt 2?! 
That's why I asked
tommyboyspurs
if he had watched Vicario. Trying to get the verdict of the experts before I make my own mind up.
Absolutely sickening.
Chelsea are such a scummy club. And Poch is now part of it all.
Listen I’m not saying that vicario is great, but this actually does seem like a lot of thought had gone into this. The kind of signing Brighton and Brentford get praised for. More importantly, we haven’t deviated from the profile.
He might suck. All I’m saying is immediately complaining without doing any research is not credible.
of course all i am saying is we need to get this spot right because a good gk is the start of a good spine
Why would it be? Are all English strikers Harry Kane?Please tell me this isn’t gonna be a Gollini Pt 2?!