Liverpool won everything and didn’t have more revenue than UTD
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)
- Thread starter Fattynomates
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
That's a cunning plan. I am not being sarcastic.
Last edited:
"Anyone but ENIC" doesn't mean what it says.... This was proven when the Iranian guy was sniffing about the club last year and it was suggested he wouldn't be a free-spender due to his ops at his other sports teams...... Suddenly he was deemed no good for us either.
Just like "Anyone but Nuno" was BS too.
Last edited:
You truly are unhinged. If anyone disagrees they must be part of a cult.
It was a bit of a perfect storm situation
Got peak money for countinho
every player recruited was a resounding success (and some)
Resulting in the perfect squad for klopp to knock into a footballing machine
we’ll soon find out if it was a unique confluence of events or if it’s something they’ve the expertise to repeat
I think it was part fluke
I doubt players are briefed by the board as to what players we're going to be bringing in, thus I don't see how players 'friends' would know either.... it's why the IDK stuff is a load of bollocks.
lol must be true then
btw I thought Paratici was the one doing the deals
Yes, they were very good after a confluence of pretty fortunate events — thank you, Barcelona— as we were for a number of years. But they’ve not been able to compete with City over a three year period let alone five or more. That they’ve been more successful than United says more about how poorly United have been run than anything about Liverpool.
As it is, their fans have quickly forgotten their success and are clamoring for them to go toe to toe with City. This is something that their owners are reluctant to do ( as they would need to spend an extra 100m per year or so) hence the sizable FSG Out movement. Shockingly, this brigade are also hopeful of owners with unlimited funds from an oil producing state.
You have become the destroyer of worlds!
In truth, they’re the only people who have a say in how the club is run.
This humble custodian language is purely for public relations.
Maybe our turn to get lucky with the Kane money
There's nothing humble about them and I did not refer to who aministers what. But it does not alter the fact the club will be there after Lewis and Levy, as it was before.
I knew nothing of who owned it when my dad told me those first stories of watching Jimmy Greaves and cared not a jot. This is not PR its my family history and a connection to something that is not about ENIC the woman's team or Go-karts. It's no more rational than any article of faith be it transubstantiation, or Moksha. These are not things that get owned no matter what companies house thinks.
.......he has a wife you know....
I was referring to their language and not them.
In practice, they are entirely responsible for the how the club is run regardless of the platitudes they might put out that suggests it’s a broader ownership.
Yes, we’ll be here after they leave but I’m under no pretense as to who ‘owns’ the club. They might not own the tradition and history but they’ve got everything else.
There is no point getting too wound up by ITK.
It's almost the same script every summer, the manager wants certain players in before deadline X.
And then, we get the rumours of manager frustrated because, player X didn't come in.
We all know what our club is about, and where it stands, so will we give the manager the best start, probably not, will we achieve much this coming season, again probably not, whoever is in charge is conned and hoodwinked from the start.
If the new fella gets, the same finishing position as last year, then he has done well or on par with what he has to operate in.
Unless old Joe decides to sell up , then this is it.
It's almost the same script every summer, the manager wants certain players in before deadline X.
And then, we get the rumours of manager frustrated because, player X didn't come in.
We all know what our club is about, and where it stands, so will we give the manager the best start, probably not, will we achieve much this coming season, again probably not, whoever is in charge is conned and hoodwinked from the start.
If the new fella gets, the same finishing position as last year, then he has done well or on par with what he has to operate in.
Unless old Joe decides to sell up , then this is it.