• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Rate this window out of 10

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10


Results are only viewable after voting.
The issue is surely HOW we spend, not HOW MUCH we spend.
The issue has been HOW we spend, which has led to a present issue with HOW MUCH we spend.

It’s clear rivals are levelling up, which compounds the history, yet still gives assets with value rises (relative to market), potentially to buffer much (all let’s face it, Hojbjerg, Reguilon, Sanchez will cover Tapsoba, another few would cover initial payment on CB2), of the present impasse.
 
Rice is an excellent player. But he is no Grealish who lifts a team to a higher level.
Partey is a baddy but is Rice that much better?

Rice is fantastic. 105m fantastic? No but football prices are weird, he's English & was by far West Ham's most iconic player .. that adds a large amount to the transfer fee. Was it worth paying? Arteta obviously thought so and they went out and got who the manager wanted.

https://theanalyst.com/eu/2023/06/declan-rice-Woolwich-man-city-transfer/

This is by far the best analysis of Rice I've seen. Off the ball there isn't anyone better. Seriously, the numbers are insane. On it he's massively underrated and gets involved loads. Work to do there still but he's no pure destroyer.

Would I be happy if we paid 105m for him? Yeah, ecstatic. We'd have England's 2nd name on the teamsheet sorted for years to come. Happy days.
 
Ramsdale was getting found out towards the end of the season wasn't he?
Yep. Did the "right" (hugely annoying) thing in his first few games with all the badge slapping and stirring up the crowd but made a number of mistakes that cost points during the run in.

I was a fan. Hoped we would sign him but now he's just a rent-a-whore badge slapping Gooner - but that's just science.
 
Need to find the graph from swizz ramble but I think we could add double that and still not get close to being in trouble,

swiss ramble calculations are correct - but with a year end of June and PL registration date of 1 July, reality is that his wages numbers are one year out.

So y/e June 22 accounts do NOT include summer 2022 transfer ins (and will also be stated net of the amount paid by loanee clubs, eg Ndomble wages might be stated as £10m pa (£200k pw) less £5m paid by Naples - which is fine if we can get another mug club discerning club who recognise Ndombele's skills, but if we don't we end up bearing more of Ndombele's wages).

Best case however is to take y/e 2022 wages and add wages of summer 2022 transfers in PLUS wages of summer 2023 transfers in PLUS an estimate of wages no longer paid by loaning clubs to work out Spurs real gross wages exposure.

And of course revenues in next years accounts may be £100m + less than last year due to no european prize money, tv and matchday revenues etc.

so the wages/revenues ratio might well move a lot - we certainly will NOT be anywhere close to Swiss Ramble's last published ratios.
 
Rice is fantastic. 105m fantastic? No but football prices are weird, he's English & was by far West Ham's most iconic player .. that adds a large amount to the transfer fee. Was it worth paying? Arteta obviously thought so and they went out and got who the manager wanted.


This is by far the best analysis of Rice I've seen. Off the ball there isn't anyone better. Seriously, the numbers are insane. On it he's massively underrated and gets involved loads. Work to do there still but he's no pure destroyer.

Would I be happy if we paid 105m for him? Yeah, ecstatic. We'd have England's 2nd name on the teamsheet sorted for years to come. Happy days.
Trying very hard not to sound like a suck ass here but the TFC podcast make the exact same point about crazy money for some midfielders and a huge difference to what are considered as a decent player.

If we paid 100M for Declan Rice (as good as I think he is) Life would be just a video game. I'm thinking specifically about hookers and baseball bats.
 
It's just data..... Do what you want with it, but 19/20 is the most logical line to draw.......

The fact is before we moved into the new gaff we had less to spend and were spending a vast amount of what we did draw in on financing approx 50% of the stadium.

Of course; if you'd rather go back to 2001 for us and all our oppo, adjust for revenue, income, national economy inflation and market inflation differentials etc. etc. etc. then be my guest, but I suspect like me; you're not inclined to do so. :)

However, setting the limit at the time the new stadium opened is reasonable. For one, the stadium depressed spending before we opened in a pretty blatant way. This did not affect our rivals.

Secondly, the new stadium has increased our capacity to spend so the time since then is a better representation of our capacity (and perhaps willingness) to spend.

Of course there are a lot of factors at play here but there is a story behind setting the cut off that Airfixx Airfixx @Airfixx did. The data only measures what it measures and doesn’t give a complete picture but it does enough to dispel certain persistant myths around a reluctance to spend.

The stadium certainly explains why we had lower net spend before 2019 than after 2019. I'm not denying that's a key factor.

However, I'd make two points:
1. The fact that our net spend was so much lower than our rivals from 2014-2019 means that the 2019 cut off is misleading when used as a comparator with other clubs, for reasons I've explained.

2. Was the low net spend 2014-2019 only due to stadium costs? It was the lowest in the PL in this time period.
 
Trying very hard not to sound like a suck ass here but the TFC podcast make the exact same point about crazy money for some midfielders and a huge difference to what are considered as a decent player.

If we paid 100M for Declan Rice (as good as I think he is) Life would be just a video game. I'm thinking specifically about hookers and baseball bats.

The market is what it is. Domestic players (esp ones in the England XI) are insanely over-priced. We got a real bargain with Maddison & the powers that be deserve credit for getting that one done.

I think he (Rice) is one of the best defensive midfielders in Europe & probably future captain material. Is that worth 105m? I dunno, markets fucked.
 
swiss ramble calculations are correct - but with a year end of June and PL registration date of 1 July, reality is that his wages numbers are one year out.

So y/e June 22 accounts do NOT include summer 2022 transfer ins (and will also be stated net of the amount paid by loanee clubs, eg Ndomble wages might be stated as £10m pa (£200k pw) less £5m paid by Naples - which is fine if we can get another mug club discerning club who recognise Ndombele's skills, but if we don't we end up bearing more of Ndombele's wages).

Best case however is to take y/e 2022 wages and add wages of summer 2022 transfers in PLUS wages of summer 2023 transfers in PLUS an estimate of wages no longer paid by loaning clubs to work out Spurs real gross wages exposure.

And of course revenues in next years accounts may be £100m + less than last year due to no european prize money, tv and matchday revenues etc.

so the wages/revenues ratio might well move a lot - we certainly will NOT be anywhere close to Swiss Ramble's last published ratios.
Neither will other clubs
 
The stadium certainly explains why we had lower net spend before 2019 than after 2019. I'm not denying that's a key factor.

However, I'd make two points:
1. The fact that our net spend was so much lower than our rivals from 2014-2019 means that the 2019 cut off is misleading when used as a comparator with other clubs, for reasons I've explained.

2. Was the low net spend 2014-2019 only due to stadium costs? It was the lowest in the PL in this time period.

Our transfers from 2016 to 2019 were awful - no decent players signed, best are probably Suarez and Moura.

And that means we cannot generate any meaningful sales revenues in recent transfers from players bought in that period because nobody will pay much for Suarez, Ndombele, Lo Celso Sessegnon etc. A huge handicap for us
 
Back
Top