• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Rate this window out of 10

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10


Results are only viewable after voting.
Occasionally someone pops their head above the parapet and does, but it's like North Korea over there, any dissent is quickly snuffed out, poster banned and all traces removed...
Can't have anyone affecting their scam. Instant ban if there's any sign of dissent in the ranks.

antonio silva or tapsoba is who we should e getting, will it thats another question

and at least schurrs is not lenglet shit
We'll get wish.com versions or nobody. I'm not sure what's worse anymore.

I'm probably too pessimistic, but what if the Kane money is already spent or partly spent? Maddison, Guglielmo, Mickey, Veliz and that's basically the money?
This IS what has happened. It's probably deeper than that too, it probably goes back to last summer and spending 60 fucking million on a donkeypigeon.
 
"A lot of our business so far has been with this in mind". Unless he means that Veliz is the direct replacement (since he's the only striker that we've signed), then the only explanation of the quote is that we've already spent the money on improving other areas of the squad.

Not seen the video but that quote tells me they have been buying players for a style suited to playing without Harry and needing another forward or 2.
 
"A lot of our business so far has been with this in mind".

Yeh, I can read thx.

Show me the part where he mentioned money

Unless he means that Veliz is the direct replacement (since he's the only striker that we've signed), then the only explanation of the quote is that we've already spent the money on improving other areas of the squad.

No it isn't.

Look.... IF what you're GUESSING proves to be right, gloat then.

Until then stop with the gymnastics.
 
You're not pessimistic, you're realistic. People are living in la-la-land and think that we're about to spend another 100M.
People's faces when they realise our transfer business is all but done and the cunt in charge has replaced Kane with Maddison, Solomon and Veliz. And upgraded our 60 goal leaking defense with Micky and Vicarius....

oh my
 
Yeah, I'm not fussed with dropping 60-70m on what you have described.

That's a whole heap of money on what's basically a gamble.

I don't rate him as highly as others, but id rather spent that on Tapsoba. Who's atleast proven at a higher level and has more experience.

I don't think another top top class centre back is on the cards anyway. I think Ange is happy with van de Ven and sees him as a future star.

Considering we knew Kane was going to go and we were still being linked with Schuurs. I imagine it'll still be him, if we are still going to sign players. No real issue with that based on what I've read.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top