........"in all 3 MF roles".
And I said: "You say that, but he'd be a piss poor DM and by your measure he can't cover Maddison......"
As I began saying to start with; it's pointless one saying "I think player X can do a job" if you don't actually want them to do it when it comes to the crunch. We're just back to that sketchy concept of "good enough to be a squad player".... Peeps say it but don't mean it.
Basically; he can't do what you said; so either he's a back-up to Maddison or you get rid.; but don't expect a player equally as good as Maddison to sit on his arse all season waiting for JM to get injured.
Given the poor fit our wingers seem to be for this system, the creative mid role takes on even more signficance. Would be foolish to be left short there.
So you'd rather spend money on a back up AM: rather that fix the system on the basis that it's intended to work and spend that money on wingers instead?
Sorry; that's a needlessly convoluted strategy.
Last edited: