Tbf if I was joining Brighton or west ham and think I was decent and see the fees they are demanding (paqueta 100m+) I would be requesting one
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Tbf if I was joining Brighton or west ham and think I was decent and see the fees they are demanding (paqueta 100m+) I would be requesting one
Loan with option to buy or Lenglet, GLC swap.
Agents with sense are going to start advising their clients that way, which means lower PL clubs with sense are going to start agreeing in order to have preferential access to the best talent.Tbf if I was joining Brighton or west ham and think I was decent and see the fees they are demanding (paqueta 100m+) I would be requesting one
Rightly so. What the fcuk has Felux shown to make him worth a punt? Nada.According to Spanish footie sites, Felix in on 220 grand a week.
Levy would have a fucking apoplexy reading that figure let alone considering it.
He's well worth a punt. The problem is the price is much higher than that.Rightly so. What the fcuk has Felux shown to make him worth a punt? Nada.
Next.
The World Cup's value is derived from the players, not the other way around. The Saudis as stakeholders, for example, could finance a football tournament of teams based on their nationality open to all players, regardless of league affiliation, and in one fell swoop rob FIFA of its primary revenue source. Currently the legalities of doing such a thing would be questionable, but likely unstoppable. If FIFA excluded certain players from their tournament, they would have no legal ground to defend.The big hammer is the ability to ban ESL players from participation with their national teams and thereby the World Cup.
Keeping the LIV golfers out of majors was that same leverage point.
The next ESL either needs FIFA's blessing (always available for the right price), or needs to have allies extensive enough to essentially re-launch the World Cup under its own aegis. The former seems the likelier, but FIFA views the ESL as a threat to its authority and rightly so.
He's not. Another waste of space.He's well worth a punt. The problem is the price is much higher than that.
Nothing you say is non-factual and you're identifying all the right hinge points.The World Cup's value is derived from the players, not the other way around. The Saudis as stakeholders, for example, could finance a football tournament of teams based on their nationality open to all players, regardless of league affiliation, and in one fell swoop rob FIFA of its primary revenue source. Currently the legalities of doing such a thing would be questionable, but likely unstoppable. If FIFA excluded certain players from their tournament, they would have no legal ground to defend.
And people would rather watch Harry Kane play for England, Neymar play for Brazil, Messi for Argentina, etc. than a bunch of 2nd Div non-ESL players.
Fooling yourself thinking the WC is a roadblock. How easily it could be replaced is precisely why UEFA and FIFA will go along - they risk everything, their very existence, by drawing that line in the sand.
Your second paragraph basically admits that - the PGA tried to stand up to the LIV, and eventually folded because they realised it was surrender or death on moral principle.
Again - you make all the arguments against your own assertion, yet somehow fail to realize it. I'm left to wonder where your typical rational mind is at.
Rightly so. What the fcuk has Felux shown to make him worth a punt? Nada.
Next.
The World Cup's value is derived from the players, not the other way around. The Saudis as stakeholders, for example, could finance a football tournament of teams based on their nationality open to all players, regardless of league affiliation, and in one fell swoop rob FIFA of its primary revenue source. Currently the legalities of doing such a thing would be questionable, but likely unstoppable. If FIFA excluded certain players from their tournament, they would have no legal ground to defend.
And people would rather watch Harry Kane play for England, Neymar play for Brazil, Messi for Argentina, etc. than a bunch of 2nd Div non-ESL players.
Fooling yourself thinking the WC is a roadblock. How easily it could be replaced is precisely why UEFA and FIFA will go along - they risk everything, their very existence, by drawing that line in the sand.
Your second paragraph basically admits that - the PGA tried to stand up to the LIV, and eventually folded because they realised it was surrender or death on moral principle.
Again - you make all the arguments against your assertion, yet somehow fail to realize it. I'm left to wonder where your typical rational mind is at.
Glad you brought it up, its a wonderful compare/contrast opportunity - how many people watch the Olympic football tournament? Same sport, same kits, similar format, and no one cares because they aren't the best players when there's another tournament the best players will play in soon enough.I'm going to say...maybe? I don't doubt that it's the elite players that helps to fuel interest and the marketing of the world cup, but I think the value is derived from suddenly having billions of people, including those who never watch football, suddenly paying attention and tuning in. Most countries don't have a Neymar, Kane, Mbappe, or Messi but you'll have people interested in what happened with Iceland all the same. The Olympics are probably the only thing that can rival it, but I think more people seem to be actually invested in the WC while its going on.
You know Kudus who is apparently going for 40m to Wet Spam?