The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Oh he was great but the adrenaline rush he gave you know who has been toxic.VDV the worst thing that happened to us?
10 Our Father's, 10 Hail Mary's...
Go do your penance sunshine!
What good does it do having them skulking around the training ground if they have no part in the manager’s plans?For the thousandth time, no you don't.
You just tell them they won't make the 25 man squad. It's no more expensive to us doing that and there's no risk we give them a whole years wages only for them to sign a contract the next day with a rival and earn double money.
If they still won't leave that's fine. But they're only hurting their own career. it makes NO difference whatsoever to us. Make them train away from the first team too so they don't get any benefit from staying.
Pay off their contracts. I know it’s a substantial sum, but if players have absolutely no part in the manager’s plans then it seems that having them stinking the place out whilst still earning their wage is counterproductive. Show them the door and move on with a slimmed down squad.
They’re entitled to the money they signed up for. I have no quarrel with that at all.
But it sends out a message to any player with a shred of pride (& the majority do) that a refusal to move on isn’t something the club suffers any more.
The exception to that is poor old Dav. I wouldn’t move to a racist, war torn shit hole either and there’s a safety argument for him that most people would accept. But “Tanguy doesn’t want to go to Turkey” & “Hugo doesn’t want to be back up at Lazio” Doesn’t wash. Pay them off and let them have a free choice instead of stressing and cocking around when there’s work to do on incomings. I’d even settle for lower priced targets that fit the managers requirements than stellar named players if it meant we could put an end to some of these irritating sagas.
For the thousandth time, no you don't.
You just tell them they won't make the 25 man squad. It's no more expensive to us doing that and there's no risk we give them a whole years wages only for them to sign a contract the next day with a rival and earn double money.
If they still won't leave that's fine. But they're only hurting their own career. it makes NO difference whatsoever to us. Make them train away from the first team too so they don't get any benefit from staying.
Pay off their contracts. I know it’s a substantial sum, but if players have absolutely no part in the manager’s plans then it seems that having them stinking the place out whilst still earning their wage is counterproductive. Show them the door and move on with a slimmed down squad.
They’re entitled to the money they signed up for. I have no quarrel with that at all.
But it sends out a message to any player with a shred of pride (& the majority do) that a refusal to move on isn’t something the club suffers any more.
The exception to that is poor old Dav. I wouldn’t move to a racist, war torn shit hole either and there’s a safety argument for him that most people would accept. But “Tanguy doesn’t want to go to Turkey” & “Hugo doesn’t want to be back up at Lazio” Doesn’t wash. Pay them off and let them have a free choice instead of stressing and cocking around when there’s work to do on incomings. I’d even settle for lower priced targets that fit the managers requirements than stellar named players if it meant we could put an end to some of these irritating sagas.
Well, fuck.Ok, here goes. Page 2253 to 2297. At least 2 new signings one hopes.
Yes, it does need visual back-up, and that’s where I’m falling a little short on him. I want to believe good things about Johnson. I am generally of the opinion that our recruitment team under Paratici and Gabbiani has a well-thought out, defensible plan, and I want to try to decipher what they’re seeing.Thanks
So interpreting this stat is still ambiguous and would need visual scouting and context.
3,000 before a player signs or leaves
Those players with no pride in themselves or their careers will do that anyway.This is starting to drive me nuts, again you can't just pay players off without them agreeing first.
Also paying players off just sends out a really shit message and bad for business, it just encourages more players to sit on their contracts knowing that the club will pay them off when things start going wrong, all you're going to do is eventually have more players just sitting their waiting to be paid off.
View: https://x.com/spurs_xtra/status/1694703042354901156?s=46&t=DK3x3JffKkqwqcsQdIeO_A
Passes the YouTube test.
Looks like a fucking Wizard.
Data is good too.
If we don’t want them, who gives a fuck whether they go to Fulham or Fiorentina?Ok, I'll try another different way that people might understand
Let's call it gardening leave.
Common practice for employers when they have a departing employee with a long notice period.
We have players who we don't want near our club for various reasons, but we're contracted to legally pay them. Put them on gardening leave so that a) they don't annoy the employees we want and b) they don't go work for a rival any sooner than we want.
The cost to THFC is the same. The benefit of not "tearing up their contracts" is huge.
It may even prompt the player to leave of their own free will.