• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers Summer Transfer Thread 2023! - Closed (Maybe)

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Rate this window out of 10

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10


Results are only viewable after voting.
I don't know for sure but I assume nobody has 100% penalty record. Harry's record is pretty damn good. Missing one high profile penalty doesn't negate the many others scored.
I get a feeling that some people are beginning to turn on Harry which is unfair....
Richarlison has taken 7 in his entire career and missed one in shocking fashion. Why has a CF only taken 7 penalties?
Kane scored 64 from 75
I have absolutely no time for anyone who does all that bullshit when they need to score. Kane is the consummate professional when he takes them. to miss a few out of the dozens he's taken is testament to that.
Sure it was bad when the 3 England players got racist shit for missing their pentolites. Skin colour has nothing to do with football.
But they should have been vilified for the actual penalties. They were all terrible.
 
I don't know for sure but I assume nobody has 100% penalty record. Harry's record is pretty damn good. Missing one high profile penalty doesn't negate the many others scored.
I get a feeling that some people are beginning to turn on Harry which is unfair....
That's my point, a missed penalty doesn't really say much about the overall record.
 
Our HG Player quota conundrum: 25-man squad maximum. 8 HG players needed for (the total allotted) 17 International player spots. U-21 players don't count towards squad limit.

HG: Forster, Austin, Tanganga, Skipp, Davies, Maddison = 6
Spence (LOANED OUT?), Sessegnon (INJ) = 2

With Spence on the roster, we currently have 7 HG Players, which means we can register 16 International players for a squad size of 23.

Lloris >>> out.
1 of Dier/Sanchez >>> out.
1 or 2 of Højbjerg, Ndombele, Lo Celso >>> out.
Reguilón >>> out.
 
Thanks.

So there's no rule requiring the PL squad to contain 3 goalkeepers?

IMO the real issue is an injury to a GK - if either Vicario or Forster were injured with only 2 GK's in squad, I'm not sure PL would be willing to invoke an 'emergency' gk rule.

So I'm betting Brandon Austin will be named as 3rd GK - we could name u21 GK Josh Keeley, but he's much less experienced.

I think Ange was talking about 'senior/experienced' GK's when he talked of not having more than 2 GK's in the squad list sent to PL
 
Our HG Player quota conundrum: 25-man squad maximum. 8 HG players needed for (the total allotted) 17 International player spots. U-21 players don't count towards squad limit.

HG: Forster, Austin, Tanganga, Skipp, Davies, Maddison = 6
Spence (LOANED OUT?), Sessegnon (INJ) = 2

With Spence on the roster, we currently have 7 HG Players, which means we can register 16 International players for a squad size of 23.

Lloris >>> out.
1 of Dier/Sanchez >>> out.
1 or 2 of Højbjerg, Ndombele, Lo Celso >>> out.
Reguilón >>> out.

In terms of squad numbers we are helped out this season as Sarr and Udogie both count as u21's this season so are in addition to the squad list sent to PL.

I agree on your general point we have a shortage of HG players - atm the list of non-club HG includes Maddison, Davies, Forster, Spence and Sessegnon, so over next year or two we may 'lose' all but Maddison as it stands.
 
I never stated I had issues with any particular values though? I said I think he wants too much money for our deadwood and that's why we struggle to move them on, I also stated it was my opinion, not a fact. My opinion is based on how we have dealt with transfers over the last 20+ years.

I stated my opinion on how I think Levy does business and how it prevents us from selling (and buying) players whilst the entire time stating it was my opinion.

The poster I asked for quotes from stated players had come out and said things proving my opinion wrong, hence why I asked for quotes.

I don't think I need to provide quotes for what is a general opinion do I?

I think the evidence over the last 20+ years of how we operate in the market is proof enough that Levy can be a huge stumbling block when it comes to transfers (and at times can also be an asset.)

I think in this instance if he can't get buyers then the players should be loaned if they can't be loaned then he needs to take the financial hit and end their contracts.

The worst scenario and one that is unacceptable is going into the new season paying wages for players who won't get games and who are going to be a negative influence.

Statements like the following aren't "general opinion":

"we know that he isn't going to want to sell someone like Ndombele for under £10M (even though I think he's worth far less than that) he won't because we overpaid for him and Levy doesn't want to take a loss."

You're presented unsubstantiated theory as fact.

As sure as you are the Levy is overpricing our deadwood this summer; why is the not a single example of this amongst all the trf tattle this summer?

With the recent exit of Aurier, Sissoko, Toby, Doherty, Rose, Lamela (and prob a few that don't immediately spring to mind) that we're prepared to accept a mere nominal fees if it means clearing the deck (like we also did in when Poch took over). We've also seen us subsidise the wages of the likes of Ndombele to get them out on loan when managers have decided they didn't want them, around.

Meanwhile, for every one of our deadwood we've seen links and interest yet none of them have been said to have gone cold due to us over-pricing (maybe most notably it seems that all of them are also being offered for loan anyway)..... The problem we have is players comfy with their nice wages and EPL status and not motivated to move.... It happens at Chavs, Man U & Chavs too..... Are their owners also of the "tight cunt" reputation too?
 
Statements like the following aren't "general opinion":

"we know that he isn't going to want to sell someone like Ndombele for under £10M (even though I think he's worth far less than that) he won't because we overpaid for him and Levy doesn't want to take a loss."

You're presented unsubstantiated theory as fact.

As sure as you are the Levy is overpricing our deadwood this summer; why is the not a single example of this amongst all the trf tattle this summer?

With the recent exit of Aurier, Sissoko, Toby, Doherty, Rose, Lamela (and prob a few that don't immediately spring to mind) that we're prepared to accept a mere nominal fees if it means clearing the deck (like we also did in when Poch took over). We've also seen us subsidise the wages of the likes of Ndombele to get them out on loan when managers have decided they didn't want them, around.

Meanwhile, for every one of our deadwood we've seen links and interest yet none of them have been said to have gone cold due to us over-pricing (maybe most notably it seems that all of them are also being offered for loan anyway)..... The problem we have is players comfy with their nice wages and EPL status and not motivated to move.... It happens at Chavs, Man U & Chavs too..... Are their owners also of the "tight cunt" reputation too?
Ok, so they won’t move.

Not an excuse to stop bringing in the players the squad needs.


Send the useless cunts to train with the u21
 
I would say £12M for Sanchez is about right, yes, I would agree in that instance.

I don't have a particular fee for Ndombele but my point is that, I think he is worth less than £10M but I don't believe Levy is going to sell a player he paid £50M+ for at that price point, that's my opinion.

If the stumbling block is wages then I would simply cut him loose so we can free up the wage space.

Honestly, the truth is, I would rather us move our deadwood on for shit money than be stuck with an overloaded squad collecting big wages and having a possible negative influence on the manager and team.

It's not like we have to sell to buy, we have just got £100M from selling Kane that has yet to be reinvested.

Would you like to fritter away 80m of that 100m Kane money on "ripping up contracts"? ......Cos that's effectively what you just proposed.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top