• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers January Transfer Thread 2024

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

This tells me Chelsea need to buy some better players.
This has been on my mind every time the topic pops up, great, he's looking good in a shit team, but is there a chance the team is doing shit because players like him are so prominent?

He was nowhere near the Chelsea side when they were doing well, he was out on loan at WBA and Crystal Palace then.

I feel like if he were all that, these outstanding performances of his would be dragging them through, as it is, maybe they're actually just at his level, midtable?

Statistically, Hojbjerg was doing a great job for us, guess what his excelling achieved? We were shit.

I feel like it would be funny to poach Chelsea's captain and supposed best player, but ultimately I also don't see how he improves on any of our 3 starting midfielders, or arguably our first reserves when everyone's fit either, and I think it could end up being a white elephant of a signing, which also has the negative side effect of improving Chelsea by a. giving them much needed funds to Hire Purchase a striker over the next 9 years... and b. remove a plodder that has somehow blagged his way to being a key player there.
 
Unless it is offset with a lower sale price. The 17 million euros quoted for Werner appears to be such a case. Else they would have probably asked for closer to 25 million. So the buying team will either pay more in the purchase fee, or in the salary, but should probably net out the same.
Going forward yes, but you have the likes of Chelsea with a squad full of mediocre but highly paid players, who will not leave if it means a serious drop in wages.

Transfer fees are only a part of the equation, when you have clubs paying out more than 70% of their income as wages, then that is going to be a focus for clubs, no matter how much the transfer fee is reduced.

We're one of the most frugal when it comes to wages, we're also one of the highest revenue raisers in World Football, yet we are showing a loss over the last few seasons.

Chelsea earn a lot less than use in revenue, yet their wage bill dwarfs ours. Newcastle have only started their journey with the Saudis, and yet they're struggling to keep within P&S. Utd are at the thick end of P&S, the list goes on.

All those clubs and more, can't offload their big earners to Europ, because everyone's skint. They can't offload to PL big spenders because they're either too old or too poor to justify the wage.

Essentially, they're stuck with them until the contract runs down. Even the Saudi league won't help them, because no one wants to stay there, it's a hellhole.

You might be right that it nets out the same, but that still leaves these clubs with a deficit they need to dig themselves out of, and if those cheaper but higher wage players fails? They're in the mire even deeper.

I really can't see them having any other option but to tighten the belt over the next few years, until they gradually see out each high paying contract, with a lower wage one to replace it.

I use Chelsea as my main example, because they're probably in the worst possible position right now. There's only so many academy products they can offload to balance their losses so, unless they get a lot better than they actually are, they can't rely on CL money. There's already 4-5 teams clearly better than them.

Other teams are affected to lesser degrees, as they likely have shorter contracts left on their big earners, but all of them will be tightening their belts for a few years I'm thinking.
 
You didn't correct anything, you just expanded on what I said.

You must be his lucky star if he scores every time you watch, what with head goal every near-4 games ratio. He's the epiphany of hype. Atleti paid an absolute fortune to trigger his release clause when they were forced to sell Griezman in the same way. Felix has never shown he's got any more in his locker than any other slightly quick, tricky winger. We already got duped into buying Gil, at least he's not earning much.

Isn't there some animosity between him and Porro?
Felix from what I’ve seen is more skilled than any of our wingers, except maybe Son.

I trust all your judgment on him though. I haven’t seen him enough to say either way, just that’s he’s been good when I’ve happened to watch. I have a feeling he’d love Angeball though, which appears to be having a rehabilitative effect on all who experience it.
 
Golf course interview with neville and going on strike for a few days was annoying though. When players say they are tottenham fans comes across as bullshit with antics like that.
We don’t know what happened there though.
The interview was edited and I'd bet my arse the context was changed significantly. And as for missing games or pre season, perhaps he genuinely was told to stay away a bit longer.
 
We don’t know what happened there though.
The interview was edited and I'd bet my arse the context was changed significantly. And as for missing games or pre season, perhaps he genuinely was told to stay away a bit longer.

Football is a business and a lot goes on that we don’t know about.

Only thing we can judge H on is where he came from (our academy) and what he did on the pitch for us.
 
Going forward yes, but you have the likes of Chelsea with a squad full of mediocre but highly paid players, who will not leave if it means a serious drop in wages.

Transfer fees are only a part of the equation, when you have clubs paying out more than 70% of their income as wages, then that is going to be a focus for clubs, no matter how much the transfer fee is reduced.

We're one of the most frugal when it comes to wages, we're also one of the highest revenue raisers in World Football, yet we are showing a loss over the last few seasons.

Chelsea earn a lot less than use in revenue, yet their wage bill dwarfs ours. Newcastle have only started their journey with the Saudis, and yet they're struggling to keep within P&S. Utd are at the thick end of P&S, the list goes on.

All those clubs and more, can't offload their big earners to Europ, because everyone's skint. They can't offload to PL big spenders because they're either too old or too poor to justify the wage.

Essentially, they're stuck with them until the contract runs down. Even the Saudi league won't help them, because no one wants to stay there, it's a hellhole.

You might be right that it nets out the same, but that still leaves these clubs with a deficit they need to dig themselves out of, and if those cheaper but higher wage players fails? They're in the mire even deeper.

I really can't see them having any other option but to tighten the belt over the next few years, until they gradually see out each high paying contract, with a lower wage one to replace it.

I use Chelsea as my main example, because they're probably in the worst possible position right now. There's only so many academy products they can offload to balance their losses so, unless they get a lot better than they actually are, they can't rely on CL money. There's already 4-5 teams clearly better than them.

Other teams are affected to lesser degrees, as they likely have shorter contracts left on their big earners, but all of them will be tightening their belts for a few years I'm thinking.

If Chelsea were in Europe they’d be fucked too. You’re only allowed losses of £35m over three years if you are in European competition. I’m assuming it has to be for three years consecutively though.
 
Back
Top