Sign up at least two prospects now ready for summer, Bardghji and Wharton for example. that seems realistic no?
Say that costs £40 million, in the summer where's the money to buy that player we really need?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Sign up at least two prospects now ready for summer, Bardghji and Wharton for example. that seems realistic no?
Thanks for answering your own question.Huh?
He's used him because we are low on numbers like I said, little 10 min cameos don't mean fuck all.
You must have missed the news that we're looking to offload him to Brighton.
Sign up at least two prospects now ready for summer, Bardghji and Wharton for example. that seems realistic no?
Thanks for answering your own question.
There is no news about Brighton. There is a rumour.
If it is a loan with no obligation to buy I would be surprised if THFC let it happen.
The richest club in London doesn't have any more than 40 million for squad building?, I guess we're in real trouble then.Say that costs £40 million, in the summer where's the money to buy that player we really need?
The richest club in London doesn't have any more than 40 million for squad building?, I guess we're in real trouble then.
Or not.When you say "ready" for summer; you're talking about 2 players that could very well have found themselves back out on loan by the end of pre-season.
Nonsense, the finished article player is rarely affordable to us..........Then you'd just be banging on about how we should have shown ambition and bought the finished article.
We're not the richest club in London, we make the most revenue not the most profit.
I knew some people would weaponise that click bait statement.![]()
Do they wonder why Barcelona, who are 4th on the list, haven't got a pot to piss in?
Jesus wept.
Do they wonder why Barcelona, who are 4th on the list, haven't got a pot to piss in?
Jesus wept.
Since the summer we've signed the following attackers:
Johnson - 50m
Veliz - 13m
Maddison - 40m
Solomon - Free
Werner - Loan
+ We have the 2nd highest scorer in the league.
+ We have the joint 7th highest scorer in the league.
No attempt has been made to replace Kane though.
As if we’d somehow be worse if we had Kane up front in this exact system instead of Richarlison lol. Arguing that Ange’s system is better than having Kane is a false equivalence. Stop blaming Kane for being an amazing player with shit managers around him the past few years.As I said before, our new style of football is what replaced Kane. Which is actually better than having Kane, because you are not relying on one player to get you goals. They come from all over, which makes it more difficult for teams to contain.
So, which one on your list do you consider the 'Kane Replacement " ?![]()
Can you not read? It's been said many times, including on recent pages here, that Ange's system works very differently to what we had before it, and that system doesn't require a single point-of-focus score-all-the-goals player like Kane - so the list provided above is a variety of assets that together replace Kane (and more).So, which one on your list do you consider the 'Kane Replacement " ?![]()
That Johnson transfer makes me wince.Since the summer we've signed the following attackers:
Johnson - 50m
Veliz - 13m
Maddison - 40m
Solomon - Free
Werner - Loan
+ We have the 2nd highest scorer in the league.
+ We have the joint 7th highest scorer in the league.
No attempt has been made to replace Kane though.![]()
Nope, I'm disagreeing with you putting a clown face after your question when it's clearly you who is the clown here.