Say that costs £40 million, in the summer where's the money to buy that player we really need?
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Transfers January Transfer Thread 2024
- Thread starter To Dare Is To Do.
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Say that costs £40 million, in the summer where's the money to buy that player we really need?
Thanks for answering your own question.
There is no news about Brighton. There is a rumour.
If it is a loan with no obligation to buy I would be surprised if THFC let it happen.
When you say "ready" for summer; you're talking about 2 players that could very well have found themselves back out on loan by the end of pre-season.
.........Then you'd just be banging on about how we should have shown ambition and bought the finished article.
So if he was used if we're low on numbers we don't need him, Son is back in a couple of weeks and Werner was bought into replace him, suspect Solomon will be back soon as well.
The richest club in London doesn't have any more than 40 million for squad building?, I guess we're in real trouble then.
We're not the richest club in London, we make the most revenue not the most profit.
I knew some people would weaponise that click bait statement.
Or not.
Nonsense, the finished article player is rarely affordable to us.
We're not the richest club in London, we make the most revenue not the most profit.
I knew some people would weaponise that click bait statement.
Do they wonder why Barcelona, who are 4th on the list, haven't got a pot to piss in?
Jesus wept.
Add on another 10 minutes a match for their bullshit explanations.
"The Premier League have been given the green light....."
Who the fuck's running the show here? .....The PL or the PGMOL ref protection cabal?
Do they wonder why Barcelona, who are 4th on the list, haven't got a pot to piss in?
Jesus wept.
You'd think that set alarm bells off wouldn't you.
It's not nonsense in the slightest....... That's exactly your M.O.
It's all suffer-porn; so it's all gravy.
Do they wonder why Barcelona, who are 4th on the list, haven't got a pot to piss in?
Jesus wept.
From the same school that bring us such gems as "They sold player X and kept the money".
So, which one on your list do you consider the 'Kane Replacement " ?
Last edited:
As if we’d somehow be worse if we had Kane up front in this exact system instead of Richarlison lol. Arguing that Ange’s system is better than having Kane is a false equivalence. Stop blaming Kane for being an amazing player with shit managers around him the past few years.
Ange’s system with Kane would be the ideal.
The guy bagged 4 goals in a preseason game. We’d be flying attack wise with him in the team.
So, which one on your list do you consider the 'Kane Replacement " ?
Somebody 'disagrees' with a question
Can you not read? It's been said many times, including on recent pages here, that Ange's system works very differently to what we had before it, and that system doesn't require a single point-of-focus score-all-the-goals player like Kane - so the list provided above is a variety of assets that together replace Kane (and more).So, which one on your list do you consider the 'Kane Replacement " ?
That Johnson transfer makes me wince.Since the summer we've signed the following attackers:
Johnson - 50m
Veliz - 13m
Maddison - 40m
Solomon - Free
Werner - Loan
+ We have the 2nd highest scorer in the league.
+ We have the joint 7th highest scorer in the league.
No attempt has been made to replace Kane though.
I can go along with the system being the Kane replacement theory in as much as you maximise what you have.
But we need him to come good.
Nope, I'm disagreeing with you putting a clown face after your question when it's clearly you who is the clown here.Somebody 'disagrees' with a question
PS Do you want me to pull up the hundreds of times that you have actually 'disagreed' with pure questions? You're so fake / disingenuous.