• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

I’m starting to think he’s not a total plonker, just a guy who has ridiculous self belief. Makes him come over as a bit of an arse. But he’s a very good player.

Agree. He’s never had a problem with previous managers or there being any rumours of him fighting with team mates or being late for training or whatever.

Sure there’s the betting problems. But Townsend got banned for betting didn’t he and that didn’t make him a cock.
 
I saw this coming all week like many of you perhaps did. The Premier League is brutal tactically and when you play the same way regardless others find you out. It is normal, they study you and look for ways to hurt you. For a couple of months (I think since the Newcastle game), all of our home games look the same and play themselves out in the same way. The reason for this is my first point earlier. The half space either side of our center backs have been targeted successfully by Bournemouth, Brentford, Brighton, even Dinosaur Dyche and now Wolves. Because it works and because only luck (and Vicario) prevented three of them not getting something out of the game. I really like Ange and what he is trying to do BUT he has to be pragmatic, surprise the opposition sometimes otherwise he will be gone sooner than we think because we are playing against the best club sides, coaches and, frankly, players in the world. Hell even a midtable team who finished 14th won a European trophy last season from this league. That is the positional equivalent of Salernitana (Serie A), Cadiz (La Liga) or Bochum (Bundesliga) or Stade Brest (Ligue Une) winning a European trophy. Some issues are as follows:

- Why is our best goal scorer, our most clinical finisher, spending game after game playing closer to the corner flag that the opposition's goal?
- If we didn't have Udogie and Porro playing, and teams (like Wolves yesterday) obviously prepared all week for Ange ball, why not play the two as conventional fullbacks and go for a 433 instead. Before the game, the only confidence I did have was if Ange deployed Royal and Davies in this way, blocking Wolves' one dimensional plan. Shockingly, when I saw Davies (especially) pushing up in a forward line of five, my heart sank.
- Have our players been told to only shoot from six yards? We have one of the best long distant shooters (Sonny) in the EPL and yet he never takes a shot anymore from distance, why? I saw Maddison score so many free kicks for Leicester, why is he always lofting an angle-less ball from free kicks now for us?
- Wolves, Brentford and Everton et. al. are crap at making the play, hence why they lose so many games against other mid table team. They cannot open up teams and there defenders are crap when they lose the ball high up the pitch, so why not sometimes play a transitional game against these teams?
- Our number 9 was awful again yesterday. Didn't understand the praise he was getting in pods during January. His second touch is a throw in and when he has more than a nanosecond on the ball he is gormless. This massively added to our disjointed performance.
- Our one touch stuff has descended into two/three touch football. Yesterday was confirmation. So painful. To beat a low block you need one or both of two things in approach play - dribbly wingers who can beat their man wide and/or one touch plays. We have nobody for the former and have abandoned the second. No chance of scoring.
- Finally, in relation to the previous point, the evidence is that against the low block of Brighton and Brentford we only scored to win the games with transitional plays not lock picking a low block.

thanx for enduring this long message.
I really can't disagree with any of this tbh.
 
It’s quite bizarre. I’m fine with him as our manager after the last lot but I think a few were too quick to proclaim him the messiah. I didn’t like him saying he’s not a magician after the game. I only saw the quote though, so not the context, which usually changes things.

But like I said this morning, being our manager is one of the hardest jobs around, I think he will handle it. I just want us to have the same manager for more than a season at the moment. We need to get away from the drama, which a lot of fans are addicted to.

Fancy saying
* it is who we are.. (what does that mean?)
* it is what we do.. (what does that mean?..?)
* i am not going to adapt
 
Agree. He’s never had a problem with previous managers or there being any rumours of him fighting with team mates or being late for training or whatever.

Sure there’s the betting problems. But Townsend got banned for betting didn’t he and that didn’t make him a cock.

I have said this before, but plenty on here droned on about Maddison and what a prick he is, before we signed him. Turns out he's a good lad and a quality player. The people slagging Toney off know fuck all about him bar the betting thing. And I doubt he's ever getting in trouble with that again.
 
Postecoglou is like the new Bielsa in terms of cult following but without the accolades or experience of him.

Remember when we had to suffer the endless paragraphs about Bielsa ball before he went to Leeds? 🤢
 
It’s quite bizarre. I’m fine with him as our manager after the last lot but I think a few were too quick to proclaim him the messiah. I didn’t like him saying he’s not a magician after the game. I only saw the quote though, so not the context, which usually changes things.

But like I said this morning, being our manager is one of the hardest jobs around, I think he will handle it. I just want us to have the same manager for more than a season at the moment. We need to get away from the drama, which a lot of fans are addicted to.
5VAu.gif
 
I thought this was the most interesting post match quote:

"We are not a team that's got individuals in it that can win games of football on their own, we don't have those players, we're not that kind of team."

If you look at the top of the table most seasons the teams that are top four do have those kind of players. The questions the quote raises are:

Does Postecoglou believe we need one of those players or does he think his system, fully implemented, will do a better job providing the goals other teams get from elite goal scorers?

Does this indicate he thinks Son isn't the type of player that can win games on their own?

How far off are we from Postecoglou feeling his system is in place?

I'm not asking any of that to imply a criticism of Postecoglou. I'm just trying to figure out the implications of what he's saying. Are we not the kind of team with star players (like a Harry Kane) who can change (win) games because we don't have that kind of player yet, or is the idea we aren't ever going to be and we'll rely on the system and not need that type player? And is there enough flexibility in the system to maximize a player like Son?
 
Last edited:
He could play this game in Scotland because teams dont have the capacity to hurt Celtic. However in the PL, teams down the table have great players who can hurt you if you are off it tactically. Neto at Wolves is a great example. Dont think Hearts or Dundee United had any players like Neto.

I agree with the argument its only his first season, and we in a steady place. But that only counts if Ange is going to evolve. If he keeps up the 'I only play one way mate' stuff, then we almost certainly cap out at competing for a top 4 spot.

Take the home defeat to Chelsea. Nicholas Jackson didnt break through until the 75th minute. You could feel Chelsea getting anxious and tense the longer the game went on. Why wouldn't we drop deep and force them to break us down, which is something they struggled with? Let the anxiety creep into them when they should be winning against 9 men. Instead we played the highline, and it was a simple through ball to Sterling who squared it to Jackson - its crazy.

He needs to become more tactical and less philosophical, or it wont end well. Because if results like this become a theme, people are going to really get agitated.
 
It’s quite bizarre. I’m fine with him as our manager after the last lot but I think a few were too quick to proclaim him the messiah. I didn’t like him saying he’s not a magician after the game. I only saw the quote though, so not the context, which usually changes things.

But like I said this morning, being our manager is one of the hardest jobs around, I think he will handle it. I just want us to have the same manager for more than a season at the moment. We need to get away from the drama, which a lot of fans are addicted to.
i mean ur right but is the drama not part of the tradition in here.
goining from winning the league to we should sell all players.lol
the reality is just boring and simple, which is we have great potential
-we have a good manager
-we have a good squad
-we havea good youth
-we have good finance
but like playing hattrick.org the hardest thing is patience to trust in the club philosophy
we have many players that can become the world greatest
 
I thought this was the most interesting post match quote:

"We are not a team that's got individuals in it that can win games of football on their own, we don't have those players, we're not that kind of team."

If you look at the top of the table most seasons the teams that are top four do have those kind of players. The questions the quote raises are:

Does Postecoglou believe we need one of those players or does he think his system, fully implemented, will do a better job providing the goals other teams get from elite goal scorers?

Does this indicate he thinks Son isn't the type of player that can win games on their own?

How far off are we from Postecoglou feeling his system is in place?

I'm asking any of that to criticize Postecoglou. I'm just trying to figure out the implications of what he's saying. Are we not the kind of team with star players (like a Harry Kane) who can change (win) games because we don't have that kind of player yet, or is the idea we aren't ever going to be and we'll rely on the system and not need that type player? And is there enough flexibility in the system to maximize a player like Son?
maybe he he plays mind games .Hoping that some players say "i show him"
 
Some people just do not have the stomach for supporting a sports team.

losing games and playing poorly doesn't make you a bad manager, especially at the beginning of your tenure at a new club.

The truth is, like every other club, including the ones people wish we were like, you have to strap in for the ride.

Ange brings the kind of football all of us were crying out for. If you want it, you have to give it longer than 6 months just like it took Klopp, Guardiola, Arteta, whoever.
 
Some people just do not have the stomach for supporting a sports team.

losing games and playing poorly doesn't make you a bad manager, especially at the beginning of your tenure at a new club.

The truth is, like every other club, including the ones people wish we were like, you have to strap in for the ride.

Ange brings the kind of football all of us were crying out for. If you want it, you have to give it longer than 6 months just like it took Klopp, Guardiola, Arteta, whoever.
I think Klopp is more comparable. Pep and Arteta are much more tactical and play a much slower tempo designed to control the game. Whereas Liverpool are much more willing to gamble and take risks. I think Liverpool are the template to follow given Ange's approach.

However why do we insist on playing out from the back all the time? Sometimes Liverpool score goals simply hoofing it forward, or going long and having Salah, Nunez, Jota ect hound the defender looking for a mistake.
 
Some people just do not have the stomach for supporting a sports team.

losing games and playing poorly doesn't make you a bad manager, especially at the beginning of your tenure at a new club.

The truth is, like every other club, including the ones people wish we were like, you have to strap in for the ride.

Ange brings the kind of football all of us were crying out for. If you want it, you have to give it longer than 6 months just like it took Klopp, Guardiola, Arteta, whoever.
Wanna bet you’ll log out and never come back the moment Postecoglou leaves Tottenham?
 
I think Klopp is more comparable. Pep and Arteta are much more tactical and play a much slower tempo designed to control the game. Whereas Liverpool are much more willing to gamble and take risks. I think Liverpool are the template to follow given Ange's approach.

However why do we insist on playing out from the back all the time? Sometimes Liverpool score goals simply hoofing it forward, or going long and having Salah, Nunez, Jota ect hound the defender looking for a mistake.

You totally missed the point... The guy wasn't talking about who has the most similar style of play.

He's talking about the fact that none of the 3 just arrived and had the team playing consistently and in their image within 2/3s of a season.
 
Pal, if there's one person on here who is balanced and doesn't attack a player for the sake of it, that's our boy Fattynomates Fattynomates .

Watch their first & especially second again and tell me with a straight face that was Biss giving 100%.

While you're at it, watch the whole game (again) and focus solely on him but with any agenda set aside...and again tell me that is a lad who tries his hardest.

You love Biss and what he could be for us, that's grand. Doesn't mean you can't be real about his level yesterday...and overall since he's joined.

But suit yourself, keep accusing Fatty of making stuff up when you couldn't have picked a less suitable candidate to pin that felony on.
I don’t believe he’s not trying. I would never aim that unless it was obvious and I do think the lad cares. We could go back and watch every game and I’ll tell you we only have 3 players who put everything into every sprint,tackle,header and do everything to win the ball back and that’s Porro,Romero and VDV.

On Biss on Saturday he gave the ball away twice in the game. What I have said is he is at fault with the goal with Royal because he does lose the ball and lets Gomez run by him at the other end of the pitch. I don’t see a player who doesn’t try or care and I won’t change my mind because fatty says he is. I wouldn’t start Biss because Bentancur is a better player.
 
Back
Top