Fantastic player, one that would be a marvellous signing for our club, but also one that we won't be signing at all.absolutely no chance, was a reply to those claiming hes average. hes a much better player than solanke or toney
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Fantastic player, one that would be a marvellous signing for our club, but also one that we won't be signing at all.absolutely no chance, was a reply to those claiming hes average. hes a much better player than solanke or toney
Better all round player
Balance before performance.Knowing us, yeah. Unfortunately.
Cant be giving the manager too many options over the bank balance
Says it all. Neither are good enough for a club that wants to be taken seriously.Solankes record is 80 in 245 in the league
85 in 270 overall.
Richys is 78 in 294 in the league
101 in 350 overall.
Ok so between Richarlison or Solanke as first choice striker, who would people prefer? (If that was the only choice).
Depends what they both want in wages.He's cheaper. Dan loves a bargain.
Also makes sense with the timing in that we had to wait until he was done at the Euros etc.
Maybe there is a spanner in the works now though with the injury to their replacement.
Yes but £11 is not a lot and you may recoup some money. Always thought he was good at Watford. I’m sure he would have made a good sub option.The advantage with Werner is he leaves after one season whilst we use the time to further develop Mikey Moore, who could well be a big player for us
Solankes record is 80 in 245 in the league
85 in 270 overall.
Richys is 78 in 294 in the league
101 in 350 overall.
Both overpricedDepends what they both want in wages.
Say Toney is 45m and wants a 5-year deal at 175k a week, that’s 90m all in.
Say Solanke is 60m and he’s so desperate to play in Europe and make the England squad he’ll take 115k. Puts the deal at £89.9m…
We don’t need Ramsey we need eze type or eze himself. Why we wasting time on someone who doesn’t get into our starting 11. I’d rather keep Gio.Its a definite improvement, albeit an unenthusiastic one.
We'd have improved our back line, midfield and attacking options in one window, whilst getting rid of pretty much every useless player in the squad.
But you're also bringing in two players who have suffered injuries, an 18 year old unproven Championship prospect and a back up left back.
Richy can’t even get himsell Fit for a pre season stroll - anything over 4M is a good fee to get that freak off the payrollyea hes defo a decent player, just not sure that hes at a level where he would improve us. id rather stick with richy if thats the options.
the number 9 has been on a decline for a long time, pep one of the big reasons for that. when you got players like lukaku going for 100m you know there's a serious drought on quality.
Sure but that will cost, conservatively, something like £150m. Likely even more with add-ons.
What are we gonna do though? Could sign a 21-year-old from the Jupiter League and hope they step up, but you’re introducing a tonne more variables.
They have good experienced manager as well. Who you’d have to say maybe has more top level experience than Ange. Same could be said about glassner who is putting g a good squad without spending shit loads.They are doing good business, will probably won't be far off of us around the top.six.