Exactly. I’ve no idea where the “we have to sell Richy to buy Solanke” argument has come from but it’s idiotic. Reeks of ENIC-apologist Stockholm syndrome to think that way.
We’ll play 50 matches this season with Europa and cups. We need more than one half decent striker. The Solanke and Neto (striker and winger) signings should be budgeted in regardless. we should be able to afford two quality attackers with our PSR advantages.
Richy leaving is a bonus, one that should be reinvested into Eze or another quality attacker. What he does should not impact Solanke/Neto at all. If we sold Richy and replaced him with Solanke, we’re right back where we were in 21-22 with no real backup striker other than Son and no real quality on the wings. And trust me, Solanke is no Harry Kane.