Some.people will do that, it's just personal opinion.
Ginola was the very definition of "mercurial winger," he could disappear in games fairly often, but he's adored here.
I can remember Waddle being criticised a great deal when he first came to us. "Lazy" was a word trotted out quite often, yet he's another adored by our fans.
I often wonder how players like these 2, and even Hoddle, would be viewed by the modern fan in the modern game. I'm pretty sure that all 3 would have critics vehemently digging them out for not having certain elements to their game, but all 3 were absolute ballers.
Yeah, Ginola was superb at home and sometimes it was like he didn't travel to the away matches. Waddle I think was a little more consistent. Both of them had the ability to get WHL on it's feet just by touching the ball - it didn't matter how far out from goal they were, you just knew something was about to happen.
Modern sport seems to be more obsessed with distance ran, pressing stats etc.