Rather a healthy mindset when you indeed know fuck all about the case and find yourself just speculating. No need to rush to conclusions or criminalize someone at this point.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Ex-Spurs Player Jermaine Jenas: Pundit
- Thread starter AaronLenin
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
I don't doubt he's a bit of a prick and the holier than thou act is a charade, but you can't make someone sign something they don't want to.
If I saw him being a prick, no PA is getting me to sign anything.
Shite pundit as well
I’ve never met him but those I’ve spoken to who have think he’s a prize cunt!
I haven't criminalised him at all.
But sure, assume his innocence beyond doubt. Because that's healthy.
People don't tend to get immediately dismissed. People don't then get the knee jerk of their agency severing ties. Whatever has happened has made his employer and representitives immediately respond with "fuck this" and get far away.
You can really get a sense of how big a cunt people are in real life by their reactions to things.
Like I said, misogyny is real, huh.
That would be just as nonsensical as assuming that he is guilty of all kinds of bad stuff based on what you actually KNOW about the case, which is indeed fuck all. Just have some patience, fella.
Considering how much the right wing press genuinely hate him. I am surprised that this has not been exposed.
Yet....
......and other posts/posters assuming it to be "trvial" and blaming "wokeness".
Exactly, we know fuck all yet.
The irony is lost on your clearly.
Hence talking in probabilities. Would've been a good point if I claimed that I know what happened there. The whole point is that absolutely nobody here does.
You don't understand the meaning of the word "probably" (*) in the context you used it.
(*i.e. Most likely)
You're literally making assumptions whilst telling others not to.
And never claimed to know what happened and certainly didn't draw a conclusion.
Sure anyone can have a guess, that's an entirely different matter.
Face-palm...... I was right... Lost on you.
And still no conclusion.
What if he was being a wankstain?
You really are a dimwit wanting an argument for no reason lol oh my days haha, jokes ...... (typical
)I basically said he gets paid separately for the 2 diff roles he had there.....
so is misandry, especially on tv & media
No smoke without fire.
And people tend to get suspended. Not outright dismissed.