I'm surprised by that. I thought Johnson created two by himself in the first half but I'm probably remembering it incorrectly.we both had 2 clear cut chances each. they had 1.15 xG and we had 0.98 xG
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I'm surprised by that. I thought Johnson created two by himself in the first half but I'm probably remembering it incorrectly.we both had 2 clear cut chances each. they had 1.15 xG and we had 0.98 xG
Those players have been purchased as financial long term investments because of their potential resale value. Nothing to do with backing the current scapegoat in the managerial hot seat.Levy has %100 backed Ange for the long term. Bergvall, Gray, Odobert, Yang
I guarantee you if Ange is not performing he will get sacked this year. That is what Levy does, he even sacked Jose right before a cup final game.... So regardless if he is backing him for the future, he needs to perform now in order to keep his job.Levy has %100 backed Ange for the long term. Bergvall, Gray, Odobert, Yang - while moving on PEH, Lo Celso, Skipp, etc etc... These are LONG TERM investments. Even Solanke isn't being bought to contend for the title this year but for when the new squad matures together.
The levels of poisonous contempt from the usual suspects in Spurs fandom isn't surprising but it's pretty fucking embarrassing.
Support the fucking club mate. If Ange doesn't work out we'll know by May next year. Until then - try and be a SUPPORTER rather than a cunt.
Ffs
All this talk about bottom half, upcoming losing streaks, early sackings, lol. Newsflash: We weren't out of the top 5 at any point last season (I'm pretty certain).I don't think Levy would leave it until after the January window if there's real problems.
He has to decide, if we're in the bottom half whether to spend the money on Ange or someone else. And he's more likely IMO to get uncomfortable backing someone who is failing.
Out of interest (and this isn’t asked in an aggy manner, I’m genuinely curious and interested) those who are saying they would get rid of Ange, who are you replacing him with?
Potter would be a risk. There's questions over whether he has the personality/leadership qualities to succeed in a big job.Personally, for me, I want Ange to stay and work
But I truly believe Graham Potter would get more out of this group of players & use the youth more
To do that he'll need the support of the fans %100.Just win us something and all the questions will go away for Ange.
We didn't want to sell Walker. £50m for him was a good deal, and I'd say this is the last time that someone has really tried to take one of our best players.Who have we sold in the last 10 years that we absolutely didn’t want to?
We didn't want to sell Walker. £50m for him was a good deal, and I'd say this is the last time that someone has really tried to take one of our best players.
£50m for Walker was too good to turn down. Subsequently we've spent way more than £50m trying to replace him. That's not smart, Daniel.
We had to sell Eriksen because he refused to sign a new deal. We had to sell Kane because we couldn't risk losing him for free. We didn't really want to lose Kane, Eriksen had really gone in the wane by that point, but in his pomp he ran the place.
You could argue that in terms of a squad we haven't really had players that the better teams wanted to poach, unlike the 1990s and 2000s. Certainly feels like that at times. It was a regular occurrence every summer being raided for our best.
They can't poach them if we don't have them.In an odd way it protects us. Romero is on Real’s radar but other than that our players are mostly 7/10 level.
Previously when we had a team of 5/10 or 6/10 players such as under Redknapp but a few exceptional talents like Modric and Bale it obviously meant we where vulnerable to our level dropping quickly if we lost two/three players.
We are now in a position where we are short 1/2 exceptional talents, a next level wide player for example or Kante style bulldog.
Liverpool finished 8th in Klopp’s first season.Klopp was an established elite manager in Europe who had earned that kind of time and patience and at that point we were comparable to the current Woolwich team so finishing behind us wasn't that bad.
I also don't think Liverpool were ever as bad as we were for the end of last season. In fact it feels like there was a pretty clear upwards tick throughout his time in charge, they consistently just got better under him the more time he had to coach and the more players that came in.
if its resale value he’s been going for then he must be an even worse chairman than I thought.Those players have been purchased as financial long term investments because of their potential resale value. Nothing to do with backing the current scapegoat in the managerial hot seat.
If you honestly think they've been bought with sporting success in mind you haven't been paying attention for the last 25 years.
Klopp in his first 3 seasons finished behind Poch. Lost 3 finals, but the Board backed him.
These young players have fuck all to do with Ange and everything to do with speculation on their future worth.Those players have been purchased as financial long term investments because of their potential resale value. Nothing to do with backing the current scapegoat in the managerial hot seat.
If you honestly think they've been bought with sporting success in mind you haven't been paying attention for the last 25 years.
It’s not just resale - it’s more that they could develop into first team players and are lower cost both in fee and especially wages. It’s a sensible strategy as long as enough senior players are also brought in (not just one!)Those players have been purchased as financial long term investments because of their potential resale value. Nothing to do with backing the current scapegoat in the managerial hot seat.
If you honestly think they've been bought with sporting success in mind you haven't been paying attention for the last 25 years.
Despite this, we’ve been generally finishing higher in the table… I find it difficult to square higher finishing positions with having less desirable players. Maybe, just maybe, we’ve been better at protecting our players more?We didn't want to sell Walker. £50m for him was a good deal, and I'd say this is the last time that someone has really tried to take one of our best players.
£50m for Walker was too good to turn down. Subsequently we've spent way more than £50m trying to replace him. That's not smart, Daniel.
We had to sell Eriksen because he refused to sign a new deal. We had to sell Kane because we couldn't risk losing him for free. We didn't really want to lose Kane, Eriksen had really gone in the wane by that point, but in his pomp he ran the place.
You could argue that in terms of a squad we haven't really had players that the better teams wanted to poach, unlike the 1990s and 2000s. Certainly feels like that at times. It was a regular occurrence every summer being raided for our best.
The worst thing about Woolwich being contenders is our fans acting like it happened at a click of a finger.I do think Ange is unfortunate in that the club fucked up so badly in support of Poch then the disasters of Jose/Nuno that the patience many Spurs fans have is understandably very very low.
It’s like ordering your food at a top restaurant and 4 hours later nothing has arrived, everyone is really hungry and finally the actual chef arrives. He is under pressure to get it done and done well.
This isn’t Ange’s Fault, the path we are trying in rebuilding and having a vision of how we want to play is something that we probably should have been doing 3-4 years earlier and if it had been the patience would have been much better but after multiple fucks up the pressure will be there to get it done and get it done as soon as it can be. Doesn’t help that our main rival look like monsters now as well, sort of rubs it in our faces.
Levy has %100 backed Ange for the long term. Bergvall, Gray, Odobert, Yang - while moving on PEH, Lo Celso, Skipp, etc etc... These are LONG TERM investments. Even Solanke isn't being bought to contend for the title this year but for when the new squad matures together.
He started getting very prickly towards the back end of last seasonHe's very bullish isn't he. The thing is if results go south the press and fans will turn and I wonder how he will react to it. He seems to have quite thin skin and gets his back up quite a lot with the media. It's all quite jokey but I can how he will get prickly if the pressure builds.
Because the fucking Spurs Scout from Twatter said so?
My goodness you're still as clownish as you were to get fucked off from SC.