Does he though — defenders?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Does he though — defenders?
I think you might be overreacting a bit...
Our points after 7 games:
10
17
17
12
11
15
14
17
12
11
13
14
12
11
15
2
At half time we looked like we would be getting another 3 points which would have put us above our average points after 7 games and would have been out 8th best start over those 16 years. 2013 we got our best ever points total and only had 4 points more than we do now. Our highest finish we only had 2 points more than we do now. Obviously it's not been a good start but we have probably deserved more points than we got based off performances. It's hardly disastrous though.
I think you might be overreacting a bit...
Our points after 7 games:
10
17
17
12
11
15
14
17
12
11
13
14
12
11
15
2
At half time we looked like we would be getting another 3 points which would have put us above our average points after 7 games and would have been out 8th best start over those 16 years. 2013 we got our best ever points total and only had 4 points more than we do now. Our highest finish we only had 2 points more than we do now. Obviously it's not been a good start but we have probably deserved more points than we got based off performances. It's hardly disastrous though.
I think you might be overreacting a bit...
Our points after 7 games:
10
17
17
12
11
15
14
17
12
11
13
14
12
11
15
2
Klopp finished 4th in his first full season getting 76 pts. Other examples Emery finished 4th in his first full season. With us Redknapp in his first full season, Poch in his second.1 more loss after 5 wins in a row and we’re having a conversation about sacking the manager? I think we should be poking at the big picture on this one. Remember Klopp missed top 4 a number of years and there was never talk about sacking him. What is the issue with giving a manager 2-3 full seasons?
Don’t know why you bother to respond. He’s only here to wind you up and stir up the whiners with a little help from his Woolwich friend.
....This silly childish nonsense is ruining the debate and really needs to stop.It wasn't racist, mate.I don't see that post as racist. I think he's absolutely right. They follow Ange/ Son and will not follow the team without them. Why is that racist? It doesn't put these people down...
I think he's on about the 88I don't see that post as racist. I think he's absolutely right. They follow Ange/ Son and will not follow the team without them. Why is that racist? It doesn't put these people down...
I love it when you are strong and masterfulJust reported you to admin for trolling, didn't think we were allowed to use rationale or context in here.
You will be hearing from my lawyers as well.
How can it be over reacting if it's factually correct?
I mean, thanks for taking the time and trouble to prove my point and all but when you see it laid down like that it just makes it even more startling.
Klopp finished 4th in his first full season getting 76 pts. Other examples Emery finished 4th in his first full season. With us Redknapp in his first full season, Poch in his second.
Yes, we lose to West Ham i think his job is hanging by a thread. We'd probably be 12th, 10 pts from 8 matches. 4 defeats from 8 this season. 9 league defeats from 15 overall.
We'd have failed to beat Woolwich, Chelsea and West Ham in 8 attempts. We've sacked pretty much every manager over 24 years for similar or on quite a few occasions less.
To counter that, some of that better form above has seen AVB, Poch and Nuno sacked in November/December. AVB and Nuno were 8th and still in Europe and the league cup when sacked. I really dont see it as a hot take that if we dont improve and become more difficult to beat then this will end the same way. We've now got a pretty friendly run of 4 league fixtures to show more consistancy.I think you might be overreacting a bit...
Our points after 7 games:
10
17
17
12
11
15
14
17
12
11
13
14
12
11
15
2
Depends on the criteria.
I get managers have their favourites to an extent but Ange shows it to an absolute ridiculous level.
Last season Maddison absolutely stank up the place for months and Ange refused to drop him, refused to try him in a different role (well except against City where Ange was absolutely dying to win that game) and just hoped he would eventually come good. Same with Romero this season where he's allowed to continuously stink the place up with shower of shit performances with no consequences to these performance.
Players like Sarr and Bissouma on tbe other hand get dropped with immediate effect. Bissouma was actually one of our best players when he's played but Ange suddenly decides he prefers Bentancur.
Part of his job (for which he is very well paid) is to answer those shit questions. Easy to turn on the campfire chat vibes when you've got a captive audience but he doesn't seem to do very well when people start to answer tough (or plain stupid) questions, he almost seems to be affronted that people might have a different take on situations.Lastly, please stop taking everything he says so literally. The cunts who shove a mic in his face after the game annoy the fuck out of me. How annoyed do you think he is after a loss to have to answer shit questions which are none of anyone's business. I completely understand he just wants to mug them off and get the fuck out of there. In the press conferences where he is behind the desk you see him calm, relaxed, jovial and insightful, for like 30 minutes. But of course everyone picks on his quick comments when he is at his most pissed off and judge him.