• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Competition Top Four Here We Come: EPL Fixtures Released 18 June 2024 at 09:00

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Are You Looking Forward To The New Season?


  • Total voters
    102
  • Poll closed .
Good work; but .

Any modelling derived outcomes
(regardless of however many variables) relies on at least some degree of “ predictability “ . I.e. some semblance of logic .

Trust me SSR ; we support a club that doesn’t do the P-word . For some reason . It’s who we are …..

In other words;

If you value your PC : just run the potential final league standings without including fixtures involving our club; it’ll end up melting into a blob of plastic and molten copper otherwise.

Exhibit A ) lose at home to ITFC ; next game do the deed away against CITEH .

COYS !

Actually up until the Spurs-Ipswich match, our predictability in terms of goals scored and goals conceded in each match was about the same as the rest of the league. We had averaged a deviation +/- 0.97 from expected goals scored (highest of top 10 teams Chelsea +/-1.05, lowest Forest at +/-0.68), and +/- 0.59 in terms of goals conceded (highest of top 10 teams Brighton +/-0.96, lowest Liverpool +/- 0.50).

The problem was that the variance of 1 or 2 goals from the expected scorelines had cost us a lot of points in 3 games in particular:
MatchModel Predicted ScoreActual ScorePoints lost vs most likely result
Leicester(A)1.2 - 2.61 - 12
Brighton(A)2.1 - 1.83 - 21
Palace(A)0.9 - 1.71 - 03

The Opta "expected points" table reflects that too.

But then the Ipswich game happened, where the model predicted score was a 4.6 - 1.1 win and it ended up a 1 - 2 loss and that's where my PC starts to melt into a blob of plastic, silicon and melted copper. My model has significantly de-rated Spurs as a result, and will take several weeks of good results to restore its former faith.
 
What's this bullshit?

Screenshot-2024-11-24-at-08-28-48.png
 
Wham beating Newcastle at St James Park leaves Newcastle behind us, and Spurs in 6th just 3 points behind 3rd place ....... and just 4 points behind 2nd.

Spurs have a GD of +14, only bettered by league leaders Liverpool with +16. Best other sides are Chelsea and Woolwich with +9, so we are much better off

And 2/3rds of season left, so plenty of time to change things
 
We would be 1 point behind City if our players had been on their game before the inter break.



Team
Played
Won
Drawn
Lost
For
Agst
GD
Points
1
12
10
1
1
24
8
16
31
2
12
7
2
3
22
17
5
23
3
12
6
4
2
23
14
9
22
4
12
6
4
2
21
12
9
22
5
12
6
4
2
21
16
5
22
6
12
6
1
5
27
13
14
19
7
12
5
4
3
15
13
2
19
8
12
5
4
3
19
19
0
19
9
12
5
3
5
23
13
10
16

Not really how it works though is it 😉
 
Table after round 12 for results against teams currently in the top 10:

Team
PPG
GDPG
GPG
Liverpool
2
0.6
1.6
Woolwich
1.62
0.62
1.5
Brighton
1.57
0
1.71
Fulham
1.5
0
1.75
Newcastle
1.43
0
1.29
Chelsea
1.33
0
1.5
Man City
1.33
-0.33
1.5
Spurs
1.2
0.8
2.2
Bournemouth
1.12
-0.25
1
Ipswich
1
-0.67
1
Crystal Palace
0.83
-0.5
0.67
Nottingham Forest
0.83
-0.83
0.83
Man Utd
0.83
-1
0.5
Aston Villa
0.75
-1.25
1
West Ham
0.57
-1.43
0.86
Wolves
0.56
-0.89
1.44
Everton
0.4
-1.6
0.6
Leicester
0.17
-1.17
1.17
Southampton
0
-1.2
0.6
Brentford
0
-1.5
0.75

(done as points per game since not everyone has played the same number of games against top 10 teams)

Corresponding table for results against bottom 10:

Team
PPG
GDPG
GPG
Liverpool
3
1.86
2.29
Man City
2.5
1.17
2.17
Chelsea
2.33
1.5
2.33
Nottingham Forest
2.33
1.17
1.67
Woolwich
2.25
1
2.25
West Ham
2.2
1.2
1.8
Brighton
2.2
1
1.8
Brentford
2.12
0.75
2.38
Aston Villa
2
0.62
1.88
Spurs
1.86
1.43
2.29
Man Utd
1.83
1
1.67
Newcastle
1.6
0
0.8
Bournemouth
1.5
0.25
2
Fulham
1.5
0
1.25
Leicester
1.5
-0.17
1.33
Wolves
1.33
0
2.33
Everton
1.29
0.14
1
Southampton
0.57
-1.29
0.86
Crystal Palace
0.5
-0.67
1
Ipswich
0.5
-1
1.17

Current Flat-Track Bully prize (doing much better vs bottom half than top half) goes to Brentford, runners-up West Ham and Forest.

Current Giant Slayer prize (better PPG vs top half than bottom half) goes to Ipswich, runners-up Crystal Palace followed by OMG Fulham.
 
Last edited:
Table after round 12 for results against teams currently in the top 10:

Team
PPG
GDPG
GPG
Liverpool
2
0.6
1.6
Woolwich
1.62
0.62
1.5
Brighton
1.57
0
1.71
Fulham
1.5
0
1.75
Newcastle
1.43
0
1.29
Chelsea
1.33
0
1.5
Man City
1.33
-0.33
1.5
Spurs
1.2
0.8
2.2
Bournemouth
1.12
-0.25
1
Ipswich
1
-0.67
1
Crystal Palace
0.83
-0.5
0.67
Nottingham Forest
0.83
-0.83
0.83
Man Utd
0.83
-1
0.5
Aston Villa
0.75
-1.25
1
West Ham
0.57
-1.43
0.86
Wolves
0.56
-0.89
1.44
Everton
0.4
-1.6
0.6
Leicester
0.17
-1.17
1.17
Southampton
0
-1.2
0.6
Brentford
0
-1.5
0.75

(done as points per game since not everyone has played the same number of games against top 10 teams)

Corresponding table for results against bottom 10:

Team
PPG
GDPG
GPG
Liverpool
3
1.86
2.29
Man City
2.5
1.17
2.17
Chelsea
2.33
1.5
2.33
Nottingham Forest
2.33
1.17
1.67
Woolwich
2.25
1
2.25
West Ham
2.2
1.2
1.8
Brighton
2.2
1
1.8
Brentford
2.12
0.75
2.38
Aston Villa
2
0.62
1.88
Spurs
1.86
1.43
2.29
Man Utd
1.83
1
1.67
Newcastle
1.6
0
0.8
Bournemouth
1.5
0.25
2
Fulham
1.5
0
1.25
Leicester
1.5
-0.17
1.33
Wolves
1.33
0
2.33
Everton
1.29
0.14
1
Southampton
0.57
-1.29
0.86
Crystal Palace
0.5
-0.67
1
Ipswich
0.5
-1
1.17

Current Flat-Track Bully prize goes to Brentford, runners-up West Ham and Forest.

Current Giant Slayer prize goes to Ipswich, runners-up Crystal Palace followed by Fulham.
Curiosity got the better of me, and I had to click on the blurred text :ange-facepalm2:
 
Back
Top