We just played the form team of the league who've been battering teams by healthy margins, and they had to dig deep to beat us, - without our two best defenders. The two non penalties they scored they did through a crowded defence, so the anti AP people need to wind their necks in about tactics, unless you are now going to start shitting the guy for allowing the players to try to save the game.
The sooner you guys face facts instead of making them up, so you can flog your latest scapegoat - Ange isn't the reason we are where we are, it's the paucity of talented players that's the problem, and that's through a lack of investment by the owners of the club.
There isn't a manager on the planet who is going to turn this current squad into a dominant and unbeatable team that harvests silverware.
And changing managers more often than most of you change your underwear, is definitely not the solution.
This is naive at best (albeit I do agree about the composition of the squad).
- The first goal is a banging strike, but watch Enzo roam from our MF without a tracker. He makes the run off Sancho, which Dragusin has to cover, this allows Sancho to cut inside into an uncongestead area (good strike though obviously).
- The same thing happened again when Dragusin put a nice last min tackle in on Jackson in the first half. We were left 4 on 4 at the back whilst pressing as no one bothered with Enzo and Dragusin got stuck between him and Jackson. It was schoolboy.
- The 2 pens are brain farts, but being impatient and trying too hard to win the ball back have been symptoms of this team for a long long time. We have no ability to just defend our box.
- Also bear in mind what came before the 2 pens. Enzo walzed out of a press from a throw with about 4 of our boys around him. Then Palmer did the same dancing through our defence.
- For the 4th, it came from our corner where the pathetically feeble Son (who basically plays like he’s scared of getting hurt all game) meekly coughs up the ball at our corner and left us with a 3 on 2. Their player dallied (I think it was Neto) but they should have created a better chance before the pen.
- There was a chance just after half time - Sancho gets the ball on the corner of box. Both Porro and Johnson go to the man with the ball (standard fair for our team) leaving Cucurella spare who ran off Sancho. Sancho played a one-two with the completely free Cucurella and in spite of being pressed by 2 of our players initially, the cunt Sancho wasn’t tracked by either. Forster made a decent save.
- The chance Palmer missed the ball in the first half, again was a case of Enzo peeling off MF completely unmarked or unchecked. Palmer should have scored.
And if this was one-off game with these issues you’d let it fly, but for too long we have seen:-
1) Really poor marking of off-ball runners. Generally this creates massive overloads for the opponents in wide areas.
2) A predisposition to always try to win the ball back instead of being content to “sit in” and not allow chances. Because of this we gamble so often and that leads to chances (see Bowen goal against).
3) We continue to play players who cough the ball up timidly in good attacking positions and allow dangerous counters. If you exclude Kulu as a wide player (Ange doesn’t want to play him there), we don’t have a wide player with good ball retention. Son and Brennan are pathetically weak players who cannot deal with opposition pressure well (particularly if it’s physical).
I’m not yet Ange out but exonerating him for these glaring tactical issues is folly.