• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 73 64.6%
  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.4%

  • Total voters
    113
oh they are burnt out physically and mentally. theres defo something gone on with maddison, i think thats fairly obvious.

solanke is new and kulu is trying to establish himself centrally and seems to have an elite mentality anyway. i think your standard footballer would of given up on him by now, its playground stuff. if they haven't then i think thats concerning because that would mean they are a bit of an idiot.

the kulu and maddison interviews post liverpool i think tell you what they think, if you read between the lines.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UALu5GYFGY&t=70s


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAQ7SSI7t3c

maddison is clearly frustrated with the braindead tactics, kulu alludes to the idiot playing the same side over and over and asking too much of them physically. even asked if its sustainable and he says no loool. i mean it dont take a rocket scientist to work out what they really think of this idiot, they arent going to say it as bluntly tho.


Maddison and Kulu Ange out confirmed ?
 
BJ is horrendously bad and should be nowhere near Spurs. He'll never be good enough. It was a braindead transfer and the sooner we move on, the better.

He is scoring tap ins. We could get anyone to do that. He's not assisting much. He's not working very hard either.

If he actually steps up, beat some players, and contribute something to the team, fair enough, but so far he's only leeching on his team mates. He's not helping them to create anything but he's living off their hard work to tap in from 2 yards.

He's a massive burden for the team. He's the reason for our severe underperformance and the few times he was benched, the team destroyed the competition.
0-4 against City
0-5 against Southampton. After the first half Ange decided to put on BJ for Son, probably thinking that BJ could get a few easy goals to pad his stats. Our entire attack died, although some Ange supporters claimed that we were suddenly managing the game. As if.
BJ needs a good coach to help him improve in taking his man on out on the wing, otherwise we will lose money trying to sell him. I don't think he can play as a lone striker except in a counter system (like Liverpool did with Diaz to us), but perhaps if we change system to a 2 striker system like Brentford he could have some ability to play as part of a "big man-little man" pairing, playing the more mobile role off a target man like Solanke.

It's gonna be tough selling Brennan for more than we bought him for. And maybe impossible. We'll just have to deal with that.
 
Anyone would do it if you have the team mates that can provide you the passes. Tell me one player who couldn't score the tap ins that BJ has scored. Just one.

Under normal circumstances there's not such a gap in quality between the players in a team. Every player usually have something to offer. That is why we're struggling. BJ is so far away from the rest of the team. That's why we smashed city and southampton when he played without him. Once he returned, we were back to the mediocre Spurs that belongs in the bottom half.

The hard part isn’t the tap in, it’s being in position to tap it in.

You are basically saying anyone could have been Gary Lineker
 
BJ needs a good coach to help him improve in taking his man on out on the wing, otherwise we will lose money trying to sell him. I don't think he can play as a lone striker except in a counter system (like Liverpool did with Diaz to us), but perhaps if we change system to a 2 striker system like Brentford he could have some ability to play as part of a "big man-little man" pairing, playing the more mobile role off a target man like Solanke.

It's gonna be tough selling Brennan for more than we bought him for. And maybe impossible. We'll just have to deal with that.
Definitely will be hard to get any good price for him. But still cheaper to do that than underperforming for another season. It's clear as day that he's the weakest link.

The last 4 games when BJ didn't start:
Man City 0-4
Southampton 0-5 (all goals scored the 45 minutes BJ didn't play)
Man U Went up 3-0 quickly
Liverpool 3-6. Only bad result in those games but nobody thinks the outcome would've been any different had BJ played.

It's so clear that we're a better unit without him.
Kulu, Solanke, Sonny and Madders. That's all we need to start with when fit. BJ can be one of the subs along with Richy and Odobert, but he's never a starter. He's a dud.
 
Maddison looks visibily disenchanted. Kulu looks disappointed but not bitter.
Definitely lends some credence to the theories that Maddison had a behind-the-scenes falling out with Ange lately.
I can see the logic here.

Ange requires his team to run, a lot and constantly. Maddison covers a lot of ground during a game but he isn't a runner in the way that Ange wants.

That they have probably fallen out is a shame since Maddison coming down deep to pick up the ball has been the catalyst of most of our best attacks this season.

At this rate it isn't too wild to say that one of them, Ange or Maddison, will leave in the summer.
 
If we are too cheap and unambitious to wait to sack him until the end of season, it represents a regression from big-team mentality/competitiveness, and a return to West Ham levels of existence.
I agree, but I think it's the least likely case. I obviously wouldn't put it past them, but IMO they're keeping him because, like it or not, they're seeing something in him worth hanging onto.

Whether the magic of those 10 matches still persists, or they're getting the impression from the amount of goals we scored this season that we will be fine as soon as Romero and VdV are back (and maybe after we sign a defender or two), or his captivating aura as an ideologue clouds their judgment and leads to them being less result-oriented in their evaluation of him compared to how they evaluated previous managers, or any combination of those, it seems they'll continue being very patient with him.

Is this a gross misjudgment? Possibly. Is it just lack of ambition? No.

This patience is of course not unlimited, but they may not run out of it as quickly as some people here hope. Because of the reasons outlined above
 
Last edited:
Maddison looks visibily disenchanted. Kulu looks disappointed but not bitter.
Definitely lends some credence to the theories that Maddison had a behind-the-scenes falling out with Ange lately.
It was the way he said "no, yeah it's not our waaa...it's not Anges way to sit back at any point.errrrmmm...I'm very proud of the lads who kept going, it can be very easy to(takes a huge breath and pauses) just try to sit back to stop anymore chances and keep it to a minimum especially when they get like ..the 5th"

He's knows it's ridiculous.
 
It was the way he said "no, yeah it's not our waaa...it's not Anges way to sit back at any point.errrrmmm...I'm very proud of the lads who kept going, it can be very easy to(takes a huge breath and pauses) just try to sit back to stop anymore chances and keep it to a minimum especially when they get like ..the 5th"

He's knows it's ridiculous.
He has 100% stopped drinking the Kool aid.
 
He has 100% stopped drinking the Kool aid.
That's why he isn't starting despite being our top scorer. Same reason I think Spence wasn't given a chance until all the injuries forced it. He's looking to get rid of anyone doubting him and then his favourites come out saying how amazing Ange is. Is that how he's getting the protection and why he hasn't been sacked yet? Because of the backing of the players?
Romero was an example of a player speaking out for Ange.

It's clear that something other than actual ability is keeping certain players out of the team.
 
The amount of our 'fans' who don't understand this is frankly incredible...total lack of football knowledge...embarrassing.
Well, if he's so good at it, why hasn't he scored even more tap ins and being at the right spot? You can equally well sk that question. Embarrassing.

You judge a footballer by how many tap ins he scores. That's ridiculous. Look at the package. What can he achieve among limited players who can't give him the tap in? Nothing! 1 goal this season that was non tap in. That's the lowest of lowest among the premier league forwards.

He's at the right place because the ball comes to the back post. He's at the back post because he's playing next to Solanke who's in the middle. Naturally, he's always going to be there if the ball is passed there. There's no 6th sense about it. It's just about being in that position while the opposite wing serves it to you an a plate.

If that's all you're good for, you're a waste of space in elite football.
 
Back
Top