• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 73 64.6%
  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.4%

  • Total voters
    113
You ain't stupid shady

So stop acting it

Brother I've just asked you what Mason would change, you couldn't fucking answer it and you said that's besides the point?? What?

Okay you tell me what the point is of changing for a manager who is unequivocally worse than Ange, far least experience and still apart of the same coaching team as Ange?

Do you expect Mason to get more out of this team, why? How?

Is Mason a specialist at pragmatism, relegation dogfights, getting the best out of players? what?

Or do you want to see him in because pure banter?

Something needs to make sense because this argument certainly doesn't.
 
that requires Levy to actually make the right decision

2 in 25 years I make it so the odds arent good
Being generous I make it three (Jol, Redknapp, Poch).

BUT:

- Jol was an assistant who only got the job cos Santini resigned
- Redknapp was a mid-season knee-jerk hire to save us from Ramos
- Poch was 2nd choice behind Van Gaal

So really, you could say he's got none right. At least, none that involved any thought or planning.

Doesn't really bode well.
 
He's bigging up the late comeback,.

He cannot really believe that. The bloke is not stupid. And you cannot fail to see through how fake that late comeback was if you've watched football for more than 6 months.
Conte had to go full loon to get sacked for the pay off. Poch had publicly (but politely) undermined Levy a while before he was sacked. Mourinho had obviously done something privately. Nuno had been ridiculed by the crowd at NWHL. Redknapp had been flirting with the FA. It has to be public to get the sack.
 
Brother I've just asked you what Mason would change, you couldn't fucking answer it and you said that's besides the point?? What?

Okay you tell me what the point is of changing for a manager who is unequivocally worse than Ange, far least experience and still apart of the same coaching team as Ange?

Do you expect Mason to get more out of this team, why? How?

Is Mason a specialist at pragmatism, relegation dogfights, getting the best out of players? what?

Or do you want to see him in because pure banter?

Something needs to make sense because this argument certainly doesn't.
I honestly think we'd be better defensively under Mason.

It's hard to see it get any worse than this.
 
It has got to a point where it is getting impossible for me to understand people that think we should go on with this manager.

Based on what really?

OK - I get it, even bigger injury issues hit and selection got worse. That does suck and makes his job more difficult. Agreed.
I was pretty much OK with the starting XI. With the assumption that Kulu would be our substitute for Solanke with Son and Madders on the wing. But in game, it was Kulu on right Sonny as ST and Madders somewhere on left I think? And we just kept hoofing long balls upfield for Solanke to take them down. Even when he was not part of the squad? :D I mean, come on. Ange has been here for more than 1,5 seasons. Maybe time to learn most basic and simple thing - if we want to keep playing like we are SON. CANNOT. BE. A. ST (!). But no. Not the simplest thing learned.

Then the game keeps going. It is painfully obvious that this setup is not working. And what is our managers solution? Just to stand there with grim face and do ABSOLUTELY FUCK ALL. Just stand there and let them score goal after goal. No instructions given, no tactical to come up with - absolutely nothing. Just was standing there and see us lose the game with first 45.

EXACTLY the same scenario as in last season home NLD. Woolwich scored 3 in first half, and not a single effort was made to stop it or make alterations. And just like today, we scrape extra late goal so everyone can come with excuse "oh, but it was such a narrow loss!". In some instances (though did not hear today anyone say it) talking about "deserving more". Fucksake - where is the progress. We are not getting better. It is always the same- no in game management.

Or if one wants to be really cynical, one could say that "well, on Wed he did make things worse in the interval, so fact that he did not today is a step forward" :D .

I am absolutely done. I want manager who wants to get the results and is willing to do ANYTHING to make it happen. Not to just stand there and do nothing. Leaving players just on their own. Ange time is totally and thoroughly up - Jan window is still open and we are still in some cup competitions, lets appoint someone who does not oversee zero progress over 450 days please. Someone who has managed before on the top level of the game, not someone from 3rd rate leagues where you can throw off first half and then still come from behind to smash half-amateurs you are facing.
 
I've strongly disliked him ever since that Man city game

He handled the whole thing farcicaly

He's a cunt

And a useless manager

I'm going on a week long bender when he is finally kicked out the door
That's the only time I've agreed with him.
We had a very real top 4 chance and we absolutely should have gone for the win.
Fans wanting us to fail stop goons succeeding was and is embarrassing.
If it was THIS season where we don't even have pride to play for, yeah, throw the game.
But never do it when we have a "prize" on the line.
the thought of Mason terrifies me TBH. It will be shit until the end of the season.
Mason is much better than this.
Much.
He’s got a 4 year deal and it’s going to cost 12 million to sack him.
Thought it was 3+1 so at best, 1.3ish years?
 
I highly doubt it's this much. Ange had barely any leverage when we signed him, it's not like when we hired Conte or Mourinho. It was a risk and there's no way Levy agreed to that big a payoff.
Read it on some Football London article.

 
Brother I've just asked you what Mason would change, you couldn't fucking answer it and you said that's besides the point?? What?

Okay you tell me what the point is of changing for a manager who is unequivocally worse than Ange, far least experience and still apart of the same coaching team as Ange?

Do you expect Mason to get more out of this team, why? How?

Is Mason a specialist at pragmatism, relegation dogfights, getting the best out of players? what?

Or do you want to see him in because pure banter?

Something needs to make sense because this argument certainly doesn't.
The point is that we are going to have to roll the dice and change something

We are on a collision course with a fucking huge iceberg

I don't even want fucking Ryan mason , no one does

We are losing every single week and nothing is changing , bringing in mason still probably won't change anything but it's as close to guaranteed if we stick with the Aussie Buffoon

But then you know this

Contrarian gotta be contrary
 
Back
Top