OK, we sack him today. The squad is currently on it's knees, they are visually knackered (which is being touted as them 'downing tools' which of course is ridicules). The injured players, out for months, won't be back up to speed from the off. They will obviously need time to get back to their best
Meaning; Over the next two months, what would a new manager change? Moreover, how could anyone change anything the way the squad is currently (someone said the other day that we should be starting Yang, Moore and Lankshear and that they would relieve the fatigue. No honestly, they really did)
"Is Ange the right man?"
"He just isn't good enough"
"His squad has been decimated so it could be argued that he hasn't had the chance to perform"
"Ange is to blame for the current state of the squad"
We may well see the current manager lose his job and on form, again, the fan base will be right back here in 18 months. Sure, we are in 15th place in the league right now but does it really matter where we finish? Honestly?
Say we did finish in the top 4 this season/any season, would you say we are going to win the Champions League? Are we set up to win? Win anything? Ever?
Obviously the answer is no. No we aren't set up to win anything. We haven't been set up to win anything for years so what does it matter where we finish in the league, which cups we get knocked out of?
"Ah yes well, if we finish in the top 4, we can sign better players", which of course is a massive bubble, right? I mean, ask yourself, who have we signed when we have played champions League that are these so called 'better players' ????
We sign a new manager today and we are back here again in 18 months, slating off the players, the staff, even each other. Again, does it matter who the current/next manager is?
Look, I honestly believe that everyone on this forum only wants what is best for this club. The count offs happen but the reason they do is born from a place of wanting what is best. But surely this cycle is obvious to even the count-offyest among us, no?