The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
We had Pep and Klopp moaning about only being able to name 7 subs or make 3 in total, then during the next game making 0 subs. Rotation is a massive issue for a lot of teams.Squads don't rotate enough with the current limits, winning the next game is too important. Extending will do little.
PSR limits wages, another 5-6 full time seniors, clubs Will take the risk with smaller squads.
Only way something changes is if too players or leagues put a cap on # games a player can play a season. That may change behaviour.
I agree. If anything spurs were happy to play along just to keep the noise of whoever their main target is.I’m calling it now. We were never interested and this has been agent and club noise to try and create a market for a shit player.
Yeah, was just talking off your post.I don't see that making a difference for the likes of Forest, the problem is going to be lack of meaningful depth to rotate with the first XI, and PSR rules are the main barrier to having a squad strong enough to fill 30 spots meaningfully.
The Tel one was heartbreaking really. He had the potential to be a game changer. Can't see us getting anyone of that quality now. I guess we'll sign 1 more but it'll be a really underwhelming nameWould be nice to be surprised but I don’t see us signing anyone else today, reckon we’re done now
Been a crapper of a window
I agree. If anything spurs were happy to play along just to keep the noise of whoever their main target is.
Now they better go and sign whoever that target is!!
You naughty boy you
View: https://x.com/thespursexpress/status/1886396435752460462?s=46&t=fbqxNuG9CT4qTaiJx8mBjg
Cheers Dan, useful intel.
Any idea on who we are pursuing then?
No? Funny that.