• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Transfers The Summer Transfer Thread 2025

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

I dont think the CL is going to help us financially as much as people think. We are going to take a massive hit with finishing 17th in terms of TV money from the premier league. The CL will just plug that gap.

We will probably benefit from extra gate receipts from the games. But you are talking 20m to 30m extra in revenue.

The major difference is we can attract better players.

We are probably down circa £30m by finishing 17th in PL rather than say 6th.

But our EL prize money is € 41m (£36m) and we've also had 8 home matches in EL plus a share of final gate money which net of player bonuses etc is probably worth £15m to Spurs, and there maybe bonuses in some of sponsorship contracts which pays us more. The Super Cup which we enter as a result of finishing EL is good for another £3m/£4m on top.

So we may well end up this season with an extra £20m cash profits, or even a little more.

Next season CL money will be a lot more, but depends how deep we go in competitions. This from Swiss Ramble showing teams prize money in February (ie not including final stages) shows the difference between EL and CL earnings.


View: https://x.com/SwissRamble/status/1887057459367338295
 
Liverpool signing Wirtz for £120-£150 million.

I swear our revenue isn't much lowee than theirs.

Why can't we sign players in this price.

Liverpool revenue is a good £100m more than Spurs.

Their squad is a lot better than ours so they can afford to pay big fees for say 2 players to improve their squad, but Spurs really want say 3 or 4 top players so will avoid the £150m player if we can get a £100m player (still huge sum).
 
Liverpool signing Wirtz for £120-£150 million.

I swear our revenue isn't much lowee than theirs.

Why can't we sign players in this price.
If that deal goes through, literally only the nation state of Qatar has ever paid more than that for a player.

And in the PSR era, that comes at a cost to other moves and perhaps sales to make it work.

We have the financial might to make a deal like that. Does that specific deal make sense for us to do? I mean, sure, maybe, Wirtz is a top player and still very young. But also maybe not.

Judge based on the overall spend, not one player.

Liverpool revenue is a good £100m more than Spurs.
That was the case in a season where we did not have European football. The prior season, with both clubs in the CL, it was just a 50M gap. We're in the same weight class financially.
 
We are probably down circa £30m by finishing 17th in PL rather than say 6th.

But our EL prize money is € 41m (£36m) and we've also had 8 home matches in EL plus a share of final gate money which net of player bonuses etc is probably worth £15m to Spurs, and there maybe bonuses in some of sponsorship contracts which pays us more. The Super Cup which we enter as a result of finishing EL is good for another £3m/£4m on top.

So we may well end up this season with an extra £20m cash profits, or even a little more.

Next season CL money will be a lot more, but depends how deep we go in competitions. This from Swiss Ramble showing teams prize money in February (ie not including final stages) shows the difference between EL and CL earnings.


View: https://x.com/SwissRamble/status/1887057459367338295

It's the television rights that add a huge amount to the coffers, from what the finance expert was saying on Sky, it adds around another £50-60M.

Take the CL prize money out of the equation, our win has added circa £100M to our finances.
 
If that deal goes through, literally only the nation state of Qatar has ever paid more than that for a player.

And in the PSR era, that comes at a cost to other moves and perhaps sales to make it work.

We have the financial might to make a deal like that. Does that specific deal make sense for us to do? I mean, sure, maybe, Wirtz is a top player and still very young. But also maybe not.

Judge based on the overall spend, not one player.


That was the case in a season where we did not have European football. The prior season, with both clubs in the CL, it was just a 50M gap. We're in the same weight class financially.

Liverpool have been consistently in CL in recent years - Spurs are not

This year despite winning EL, Liverpool's revenues from CL this year will probably be 2 if not 3 times Spurs EL revenues ....... and overall Liverpool's revenues will be a lot higher than Spurs.

Over last say 5 years Liverpool average revenues are probably close to 100m more than Spurs ..... and even if its 50m over a 5 year period its 250m, which is why we still have catching up to do. And why Liverpool can sign the odd player for 150m which would not make sense for Spurs to do
 
It's the television rights that add a huge amount to the coffers, from what the finance expert was saying on Sky, it adds around another £50-60M.

Take the CL prize money out of the equation, our win has added circa £100M to our finances.

The tv money goes to uefa who then award prize money to the competing clubs - uefa do not have any other source of money to award prize money.

And this year due to our EL campaign and win UEFA have awarded Spurs 41m Euros (funded from TV monies paid to UEFA) whereas CL clubs might be getting 3 times or so more.
 
Back
Top