• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Management So (hypothetically) who replaces Ange then?

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Who to replace Ange?

  • Andoni Iraola

  • Edin Terzic

  • Graham Potter

  • Thomas Frank

  • Marco Silva

  • Kieran McKenna

  • Ryan Mason (Full Time)

  • Michel

  • Xavi

  • Mauricio Pochettino

  • Dino Toppmoller

  • Simone Inzaghi

  • Sean Dyche (Click here if you're an idiot)

  • No-one (Ange new contract)

  • Oliver Glasner

  • Vincenzo Italiano

  • Vitor Pereira

  • Scott Parker

  • Will Still


Results are only viewable after voting.
Yeah, those ten matches didn’t count. Of course. Yet somehow we managed to get another 40 points or so, on top of those first 10 games. Go figure. That would have got us CL this season.

I don’t give a fuck what Ange would do with Brentford, I care what Frank would do with Spurs, and there is fuck all evidence to suggest he’s spunkbread.
You're an expert telling everybody what you don't want. But you very rarely expressing what you do want. I see you're not too keen on Frank. I agree on that one. But what do you want? Keep a Ange or replace him? If you want to replace him. Who's you top candidate?


For the record. I want Glasner or the exciting option McKenna over Frank. The last days rumours about Carrick tickles a bit too.
 
Last edited:
The question mark is is he particularly good at coaching and setting up a team to play an intricate possession game though? He doesn’t do it with Brentford in the PL, although you could argue it’s because he doesn’t think they have the talent to do it. Some say he did in the Champ with them though.

Yes. Im not saying that Frank is the right answer. I just find all the talk of a manager style, his formation, does he play-out-from-the-back or not and what is his philosophy or football dna a bit strange.
 
What else is there to talk about when evaluating a prospective manager?
Hehe, no i mean in general. In the way football is watched. How managers swear to a style. I agree with the your post i originally replied to. Its just weird.

Like Kompany for example. He played a aggressive possesion based football in the Championship, gets a promotion and stays true to his way of playing, gets relegated and fucks of to Bayern Munchen. Its idiotic.
 
Hehe, no i mean in general. In the way football is watched. How managers swear to a style. I agree with the your post i originally replied to. Its just weird.

Like Kompany for example. He played an aggressive possesion based football in the Championship, gets a promotion and stays true to his way of playing, gets relegated and fucks of to Bayern Munchen. Its idiotic.
I mean, top club’s would rather hire a guy who plays possession football and gets relegated than someone who plays low block and survives like Dyche and Moyes. What’s the point hiring someone who won’t show they want to do something with the ball.
 
You're an expert telling everybody what you don't want. But you very rarely expressing what you do want. I see you're not too keen on Frank. I agree on that one. But what do you want? Keep a Ange or replace him? If you want to replace him. Who's you top candidate?


For the record. I want Glasner or the exciting option McKenna over Frank. The last days rumours about Carrick tickles a bit too.

Hoeness, DeZerbi, Motta, Italiano for me.
 
Thanks. Missed that. Good calls. Italiano has extended if I understood it correctly. But one of the other 3 shouldn't be impossible to get.
 
Back
Top