Thanks for a post that isn't just insults. Appreciate it.
Ok, so here's my nuance.
Had we prioritised league results despite the disastrous injuries we would maybe have finished between 8th and 12th. Instead he rotated and protected key players to get us through the Europa League knock outs. I agree with his strategy there given the context of known resources.
This season the injury crisis meant we had to blood youth to an extent we hadn't planned for. The benefits of that will not be seen for some time (possibly next year but definitely in years to come). The last remnants of the Loch era left the squad in Ange's first year, or they showed signs of age and decline. Due to the recruitment of youth (something I'm not opposed to) we had a perfect storm of lack of depth, experience, and fitness availability. I don't think Ange was the root cause of that.
He has evidently installed a winning mentality and a squad cohesion, perhaps a siege mentality, that I felt would become an irresistible force if the club supplemented it with decent quality recruitment this summer.
Your counterfactual is irrelevant because it didn't happen, but I'll indulge it.
Had he lost against Man United I think I would have been open to a change of manager and a new start. I would have felt sorry for Ange because I think he was dealt a difficult hand (fans used to challenging for champions league football, a great striker departing, an exodus of aging experience including many leaders), but I would have understood and moved on.
That did not happen though. We did win the Europa League. Ange's insistence on following his approach to the competition while balancing the pressure he was receiving from the press and club hierarchy is what delivered the trophy.
It was our first meaningful trophy since 1991 and vital in changing the club culture and outside perception, but yesterday we fired him.