People go on like it's chicken/egg, but are inventing a perspective of Liverpool that doesn't exist.
- They don't have the big wage bill of City, Woolwich, Man Utd, or Man City.
- They didn't "spend big" to win the league.
- They didn't give their new manager players for a rebuild last summer, and only added one injury-prone midfielder who barely played
- They don't buy big established "world class" players, but rather take calculated gambles
- They got to the end of the season with the contracts of their 3 biggest players running out. One of their best players just left with a token transfer fee, but was effectively about to be out of contract. They've just put two 33 year old players on huge contracts.
All of the above is the reality of Liverpool that would cause utter outrage on here.
We probably could sign a £100m+ player if we won the league or the CL, but there's clearly just nuances separating Liverpool from this club, and it isn't anything to do with ownership - they just have been more successful with their gambles so far.
It is still far from certain whether or not that move will pay off for them - they still don't have a replacement for TAA yet, and have no succession plan for VVD or Salah. There's no obvious sign how Allison/Marmadashvilli will work. A lot of flaws in their strategy so far, in paying so much money in the area that isn't obviously where they needed to.
People will say that they are being clever doing business early, but they're now at the mercy of other clubs for the players they now need to shift (e.g. Nunez)