Infairness a dish like Lloris can pull off any look he likesPink is fairly common for goalkeeper kits, did you react the same way over this?
![]()
![]()
I think that kit will look good when Vic and Kinsky are actually wearing it in matches
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Infairness a dish like Lloris can pull off any look he likesPink is fairly common for goalkeeper kits, did you react the same way over this?
![]()
![]()
I think that kit will look good when Vic and Kinsky are actually wearing it in matches
Mate I don't wear colours - I'm a Goth innit white/black/gray/navy tis the way!I like this.
What's wrong with pink? Not man enough to pull it off?
![]()
I did indeed reacts the same - Neon pink is just that NEON pink.Pink is fairly common for goalkeeper kits, did you react the same way over this?
![]()
![]()
I think that kit will look good when Vic and Kinsky are actually wearing it in matches
Aren't white/black/gray/navy all colours?Mate I don't wear colours - I'm a Goth innit white/black/gray/navy tis the way!

Some can argue white & black aren't technically colours - I don't know I'm colourblind & it's all qualia innit.
City’s Puma kits have been woeful to be fair, constantly look like shite![]()
Man City agree Premier League record £1bn kit deal
Manchester City extend their kit partnership with Puma for at least 10 years, with the contract understood to be worth a minimum of £1bn, making it the largest deal in the Premier League.www.bbc.co.uk
£100m a year? For fuck's sake.
Then there's us getting £30m for the privilege of wearing the worst kits I have ever fucking seen. And the worst part is we're stuck with this until 2033.
If there isn't some sort of clause in there to ensure Nike are paying fair market rate then this has got to go down as one of the worst deals ever. Heads should roll.
I agree they look shit, but at least they're getting paid for it.City’s Puma kits have been woeful to be fair, constantly look like shite
![]()
Man City agree Premier League record £1bn kit deal
Manchester City extend their kit partnership with Puma for at least 10 years, with the contract understood to be worth a minimum of £1bn, making it the largest deal in the Premier League.www.bbc.co.uk
£100m a year? For fuck's sake.
Then there's us getting £30m for the privilege of wearing the worst kits I have ever fucking seen. And the worst part is we're stuck with this until 2033.
If there isn't some sort of clause in there to ensure Nike are paying fair market rate then this has got to go down as one of the worst deals ever. Heads should roll.
Glad you didn't say 3 cos it's limited to 2 per person "Please note this product is limited to 2 products per customer. Online Only, Limited Edition shirt."
![]()
Man City agree Premier League record £1bn kit deal
Manchester City extend their kit partnership with Puma for at least 10 years, with the contract understood to be worth a minimum of £1bn, making it the largest deal in the Premier League.www.bbc.com
So we are stuck with Nike at 30% of the top-of-market rate until 2033.
A third of what United is getting, half of what Liverpool is getting.
Signing a 15-year deal with Nike in 2018 (back when 30M per year was a more competitive figure) was a risk, and it has not paid off.
Don't like it as much as...For anyone that hates AIA, you can buy the away shirt with a Stray Kids print instead...
![]()
Might snap one up from China, looks better than the AIA versionFor anyone that hates AIA, you can buy the away shirt with a Stray Kids print instead...
![]()
I wouldn’t want anyone to think I’m (more of) a nonce though.For anyone that hates AIA, you can buy the away shirt with a Stray Kids print instead...
![]()