The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

You cave a bit too easily!
The £60m release clause is now public knowledge so he’ll likely be moving irrespective of whether it’s to us or another club.
Worst case scenario he just runs his contract down and Forest get nowt.
View: https://x.com/tottenhamtiers/status/1945151592476328172?s=46&t=H68eZ9jqNvt-Ui-dXDbExg
This is all bark. If you actually believed there was illegal play going on you’d immediately raise legal action. It’s a scare tactic to try and put Spurs off.
It’s harder to prove Spurs made an illegal approach than it is for spurs to prove they didn’t.
Does it hell!

No it doesn't.
Once again, there is no third team. There is one team with the player under contract and another team which bids £80 million.No actually, it would go to the player for their decision. The selling club doesn't have a leg to stand on to dictate that the 60m offer is no longer valid.
are we really tolerating rival fans coming here to troll us now? ffs
Yeah you’re probably right as far as Prem clubs are concerned this summer.Who else is paying the 60m for MGW?
City obviously knew it but decided Cherki and Reijnders were better value in the 40’s
Woolwich will get Eze for less than 60m
Who’s left? Newcastle are chasing a striker for big money
Forest should probably start to realize the only club giving them 60m is us. If they don’t take it, next summer he leaves for 40m. If his form holds up.
I pretty much posted that theory yesterday.Has anyone considered that maybe the sensible people at Forest have asked us to keep shtum while they line up their replacements?
The Greek’s tantrum could be just the smoke screen needed while they get deals concluded.
View: https://x.com/tottenhamtiers/status/1945151592476328172?s=46&t=H68eZ9jqNvt-Ui-dXDbExg
This is all bark. If you actually believed there was illegal play going on you’d immediately raise legal action. It’s a scare tactic to try and put Spurs off.
It’s harder to prove Spurs made an illegal approach than it is for spurs to prove they didn’t.
Why should we give a shit about what City did or didn't do? They didn't make a formal offer so it's moot. It's simply irrelevant to the fact that the release clause was triggered.
Why should we give a shit about what City did or didn't do? They didn't make a formal offer so it's moot. It's simply irrelevant to the fact that the release clause was triggered.
why don't you crawl back into your shit hole club?Once again, there is no third team. There is one team with the player under contract and another team which bids £80 million.
Not for much longer methinks.are we really tolerating rival fans coming here to troll us now? ffs
A fat plate smasher claims that Spurs spoke to the player or his agent when they had not received the written permission that they needed before they were permitted to do so and that confidential information was obtained and use by Spurs which gave them a commercial advantage.The club are not obliged to sell if the other party has not acted in accordance to the correct procedure. It seems that in this case Forest claim that Spurs spoke to the player or his agent when they had not received the written permission that they needed before they were permitted to do so and that confidential information was obtained and use by Spurs which gave them a commercial advantage.
Depending on circumstances Forest could take action against Morgan-Gibbs, his agent or Spurs. They can also make a complaint to the Premier League, which they have done.
I don't know what the complaint is, you don't know what the complaint is, but both clubs and the Premier League have known about it since yesterday.
Yeah you’re probably right as far as Prem clubs are concerned this summer.
It’s whether any Foreign clubs fancy him and have the dosh (which most don’t seem to have).
You are quite at liberty to show why my comment was incorrect, I'm willing to discuss it.I don't think you really understand the words "release clause".