The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I don't understand how you can not understand his contractual obligation if all of the requirements have been met. He's legally bound.I don't understand how anyone can conclude from what has been reported that Marinakis is going to "come to his senses" and back down.
That has already been explained to you. You just chose to ignore it.Correct.
Well, Forest can, at the very least, deny him that amicability.
It's crazy that he's training at a club that has violated his contract. This is not a garden variety transfer dispute, I think that's where people are losing the thread here.
If Forest didn't pay his wages, he would not be at the training ground.
Both options are correct. But there is a third option.This is exactly right and there are only two possible reasons CAA Stellar weren't screaming bloody murder on every TV show in the country first thing Friday morning:
1. They've done something wrong
2. Their client doesn't want to fight this
Either way, Forest wins.
Yessh and why have they spent the last year trying to remove or increase it if they weren't terrified some club might come in and hit the spot.If the NDA is breched by the player then what exactly is the point of having a clause in the first place?
"OK Morgan, we agree to put a release clause in your contract but you can't tell anyone about it otherwise it's void"![]()
As part of the negotiation. Maybe it was 80m with no NDA or 60m with an NDA and the latter was more valuable to him.Right so why would the player agree to put an NDA on that and if true why would the player/agent leak the info if he knows that it's a potential breach of contract?
It would seem crazy to me for a number to exist that is extortionate enough to satisfy Marinakis but not too extortionate to be unacceptable to Levy.To be honest, this is the likeliest scenario of how it will end, and how it has been heading since day one.
We will pay over the release clause, in stage payments and then the tapping up case will go away.
so hoodrat vs hoodrat in a twerkathon.
Is this guy actually ITK? I know he broke the Bergvall injury news..
View: https://x.com/THFC_Himothy/status/1945184649858236693
Username change required:There is not, can not, and will not be any settlement. Forest have made that crystal clear.

Like the BBCOnce moved into a gaff where the previous owner owed some money. I used to RTS the letters but after a couple of years starting reading them.
"We are considering legal action (LA.) "
"We are really, really considering LA."
"This case has been referred to our really, really considering LA dept."
Etc..
You have sorely tempted me to cancel my DD.Like the BBC
- you must pay license fee
- you really must
- nastier one in red ink
- nastier one in red ink and threat of mythical transits with detectors coming round
- £170 pa saved !
Thanks perhaps you have more time on your hands?Must have been mentioned about 50 times on this thread already.
The blind trust got revoked as soon as Olympiacos and Nottingham Forest did not end up in same European competition for next season.