Because a group/league stage game is an entirely different prospect to that level of footballer than a semi final. Different time of the season/weather too - the only “intimidating” thing about Bodo is the freezing pitch which we didn’t actually face in the semi final, we also got the home leg in first so took a nice lead to Bodo. Made life easier.
Yes. 17th. 38 points. There’s no data whatsoever that says anything other than this was the worst Spurs league season in modern premier league history. Frank also struggling doesn’t mean Ange was overachieving.
17th is data. The worst non-relegated team.
We are higher in the league than we ended up under Ange - and regardless it’s pretty clear Frank isn’t doing very well. It’s entirely possible someone else would do better.
Talking “fan expectation” and “patience” in the context of being the worst non-relegated team in the premier league is silly. We lost twenty odd games. Ange got sacked because for over a year the club had been in a doom spiral, starting at the end of his first season & then leading in to an entire season of garbage. There was no progress. *
Another manager is getting criticised for getting really bad results? This isn’t derangement, it’s just a modern premier league football club. That’s how it works.
Me being able, as an adult, to objectively look at that Europa league win and who we beat and view the achievement in that context does not mean it wasn’t enjoyable to win. I don’t feel the need to big up Ange’s accomplishment to have enjoyed the experience. It was great fun, it was also very low quality.
*He then carried on being a total loser for Forest. The only time he overachieved was in his first season, and even then with a heavy dose of context and the more time he got with the team the worst results became. The guy was rubbish. Frank doing rubbish doesn’t equate to him being good.