A) I left yours alone since I've already made my points against your elsewhere, so there's no point in us continuing this here. In fact, if you'd like, I'd like to invite you to PM me so we don't continue flaunting our feud in front of everyone.
B) My team for next week features the best we have at our disposal. I can assure you, some of those players I very much wish I didn't have to play if I had healthier options available. In fact, more than half that team wouldn't see the field in optimally healthy conditions. Like I said, I do not envy Sherwood with having to make that selection next week.
C) It is a commonly used method of brief communication on football forums based on assumption that a "second string" is written out that features substitutes, not a cited and reasoned out team. Rather than countering each of your points about that team, I think it's important this be pointed out for your own sake in efficient communication with your peers here and so that you reconsider your counterpoints on the premise they are thereby null and void.
