Ange had a 4 or 5 year contract, and he said from day one, that it would take him 3-4 seasons to get the players he wanted playing the way he wanted.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Manager Ange Postecoglou
- Thread starter The Fighting Cock
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Funny that Ange got them scoring goals then isn't it.
Uh yeah like I said he was stubborn so it's to do with himself and the players...
The only comparison I have made is style of play, not achievements.
Kompany got a team relegated playing the exact same tactics he's playing now earning similar PPG that Ange got yet he's on the verge of a CL final, what does that tell you?
It's not science.
Funny you believe that bullsh*t. Because obviously you still need to produce results and development as this business does not give you 3-4 seasons for free. No chance, at no club. How should we acquire the top players he wanted if we are not in Europe and sh*t for a few seasons? Good players like Van de Ven etc do not want to wait either for 3-4 years to maybe be good. They will walk and push for a way out before that.
You now compare Anges squad available to Kompanys squad at Burnley? It tells me you are far off the mark.
Did the management get him the players he wanted? NO
You need to work on your reading comprehension my friend.
Every argument gets dismissed so easily in here man
I'm surprised the number twenty two didn't surface again.
Playing attacking football above all else does require you to have the best players, to spend the most money, have the best scouting, etc.
Pretty sure most managers could do well at a club that has the very best players. In the same way almost every manager will struggle with shite players.
On last nights match, we watched two juggernauts going at it. Rested players who play in easier leagues. No huge surprise they could go toe to toe like that.
Pretty sure most managers could do well at a club that has the very best players. In the same way almost every manager will struggle with shite players.
On last nights match, we watched two juggernauts going at it. Rested players who play in easier leagues. No huge surprise they could go toe to toe like that.
If the management had backed him over 4 years, we would have been playing like PSG & Bayern did.
End of story.
Post removed.
Bruh you were just praising attacking football last night, what happened to you man, I thought we found a truce
Bruh you were just praising attacking football last night, what happened to you man, I thought we found a truce
I love attacking football. I don’t think any manager who wants to play attacking football is great automatically.
You can win and do well with basically any style.. the success bit is in the nuance between that. I think we should want to emulate attacking football because entertaining is in our DNA and because it’s more interesting.
You're a man without vision.
When Ange first started, I could visualise where he wanted to be.
It's a crying shame that he didn't get the backing.
FTFY.
As a heads up, X would do X if he got X is not an argument, it’s just fan fiction.
Reckon Ange can do what Kompany is doing now, Kompany has the personality to work with big players and at top clubs I see similar traits in Ange, he'd get a buy in from those players because of his aura.