What I posted was the sum of the section about financials.
Rather than playing cat n mouse; maybe you could quote the part that explicitly concerns you?
No thanks. If you’re not interested, that’s fine.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
What I posted was the sum of the section about financials.
Rather than playing cat n mouse; maybe you could quote the part that explicitly concerns you?
View: https://x.com/fabrizioromano/status/2059003892986266022?s=46
Juve trying to hijack the move for Robertson

I joined the dots and saw a picture of Sky click bait.There was a lot more said than that one paragraph. Wasn’t there?
You’re a sensible fella, you can join the dots of a multi faceted club PR piece.
My adhd doesn't let me pay much attention to tldr tabloid bollocks.
It didn't actually say what you claimed it did though, did it.
No, we need to be realistic and I think we will either bring back Parrott and/or add Lankshear to the squad (he’s 21 now , I believe, and take up a squad slot, although I would prefer another loan , perhaps to a promoted team) but I don’t see a complete revamp with three guys 24 and under.Idiots will be idiots.
I put my wish list to revamp the entire forward line including bigger spend in LW. Because I want to be realistic
Sure, if you want me to play idiotic football manager, I can satisfy that too....![]()
Juve can have Robertson . 32 and washed. His legs are gone. If the club were getting him for leadership only, then I'd rather just keep Gentle Ben. At least he loves this club, Robertson is coming just for the paycheck
I'd rather Lankshear- just off a successful season in the Champo, built like a house, and still lots of potential upside.No, we need to be realistic and I think we will either bring back Parrott and/or add Lankshear to the squad (he’s 21 now , I believe, and take up a squad slot, although I would prefer another loan , perhaps to a promoted team) but I don’t see a complete revamp with three guys 24 and under.
No chance- he's been a good fit at newc despite a second half dry spell.What's all the Woltemade talk?
Keep seeing people putting him in their line ups etc
I know many are underestimating Parrott. His game has grown so much in 3 years. Not just lame Dutch league form. He carried Ireland into WC with 6 goals against Portugal, Hungary & Czech - thats no mean feat. For me, he ticks all the boxes and more importantly he wont be expensive. That means, we can always take a punt on another striker.No, we need to be realistic and I think we will either bring back Parrott and/or add Lankshear to the squad (he’s 21 now , I believe, and take up a squad slot, although I would prefer another loan , perhaps to a promoted team) but I don’t see a complete revamp with three guys 24 and under.
Not a biggie, pal. and if you’ve got a different take from it, equally not a biggie. Is it?
I wasn't trying to win points, just stating a fact.I haven’t claimed anything. I’ve made an opinion/jusgrment based on what I’ve read, that’s all. If you’ve got a different take after having a look, that’s great.
Also, don’t use ADHD to win points on the internet. It’s not very becoming.
He's talking out of his arse mate, just trying to rouse the rabble.Why are you claiming I'm not interested? That's silly.....
Twice now you've made out that there is something IN the article that people haven't read.
"There was a lot more said than that one paragraph."
Yet have spent more time dancing round the subject than it would have taken to do a quick copy and past of what part concerns you..........
"No biggy"; but curious much the same.
Why are you claiming I'm not interested? That's silly.....
Twice now you've made out that there is something IN the article that people haven't read.
"There was a lot more said than that one paragraph."
Yet have spent more time dancing round the subject than it would have taken to do a quick copy and past of what part concerns you..........
"No biggy"; but curious much the same.
That's even worse of they offered him nothing and werenjust happy to let him go for free. And here we come in with a big pay package for him. Prob offering exactly what he was on at Liverpool or moreSource? I only ask because Crook stated on air this fine morn that Liverpoo didn't offer him anything.
He's talking out of his arse mate, just trying to rouse the rabble.
I’ve done that annoying mistake again of posting my opinion about an upcoming Tottenham Hotspur summer transfer window on a Tottenham Hotspur forum in a thread about the Summer Transfer window, haven’t I?!
Need to stop doing that.![]()