The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Oddly, Chelsea goes for Everton. We get the East Village, though, which is nice. But, basically, as my friend says, the map is nonsense. But fun nonsense.Chelsea has the financial district. Fitting.
Upper East and West sides have Pool and Man Utd.
What's the dark blue bit in between Liverpool & Man United?![]()
Something very, very fitting about Staten Island—the Jersey Shoreist part of the city—going for Newcastle.
Central Park
Sol's arse
I meant to comment on this a while back when the numbers were first coming in from that poll but forgot.
There is no way in hell we are even the third most supported team in America. We just happen to have a lot of extremely passionate supporters here from all over the country/world. Most people who follow the more successful teams are very lazy about it (thats not to say there aren't some absolute die-hards among them too) in a way that its probably easy to be if all your team does is win trophy after trophy or if they used to.
I'd say the polls are probably being voter-bombed. Thats not to shit on our support here which is obviously exploding in popularity. The fact that our (unofficial) supporters group here in St. Louis is a third the size of one in Atlanta or other non-traditional soccer cities is fucking incredible. There's an Arkansas Spurs for fucks sake!
Ah right thanks - wasn't sure why it was unclaimed territory.
Haha, I love that midtown is Man City. Perfect. I kinda wish Spurs had gotten Brooklyn.
NBC produced little films about each club in the PL. ours starts out well, but ends on a meh note. I don't think either comparison--the Mets or Knicks--is particularly apt, since we're rather obviously a team on the up and up. I was going to say we are a bit like the Rays, who are well-run and in the mix, but they have no history. Maybe we are like the 2003 Red Sox. Well run with great history, but missing the final pieces to become something legendary in the here and now. Anyway:
Http://nbcsports.com/soccer/premiere-league/team-guide-tottenham
NBC produced little films about each club in the PL. ours starts out well, but ends on a meh note. I don't think either comparison--the Mets or Knicks--is particularly apt, since we're rather obviously a team on the up and up. I was going to say we are a bit like the Rays, who are well-run and in the mix, but they have no history. Maybe we are like the 2003 Red Sox. Well run with great history, but missing the final pieces to become something legendary in the here and now. Anyway:
Http://nbcsports.com/soccer/premiere-league/team-guide-tottenham
Well, fuck the curse, which was just a way for Shaughnessey to sell books.I kinda like the 2003 red sox reference. The selling babe Ruth to a rival is sooo spursy. And then the curse I can see happening.
Well, fuck the curse, which was just a way for Shaughnessey to sell books.
In 2003, the Sox were well run, had a young and unproven GM, featured a long history that yielded honours (AL championship) once every decade or so, and were engaged in a decade-long project of chipping away at the success of their nearest (and most hated) rivals. They also had a reputation for Spursy collapses. I like it.