You got found out months ago mate, I can’t take credit for anything.
Yes "Found Out"

The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
You got found out months ago mate, I can’t take credit for anything.

Are they? If they kept Poch, I’d say they would be, but with this new guy it’s hard to predict how they’ll do.
is poch ever a worry really? i thought the players started to look a bit more comfy. palmer is obviously a decent player too. dont think theyll be challenging for the league! but defo going to be in competition with us at the very least i think.Are they? If they kept Poch, I’d say they would be, but with this new guy it’s hard to predict how they’ll do.
we were lucky last year that the league was poor. next year is probably going to be tougher.
the only 'big' clubs that have been struggling in recent years are chelsea and united. both have still won more in the last 4 years than weve won in the last 30...so if thats struggling i wanna struggle too.Literally what someone says every single year and every year big clubs struggle
Good post, and I agree this is something that confuses me about Ange.I’m in two minds with Ange.
There’s obviously the perfectly reasonable opinion that we are bringing in young players, building for the future and, as fans, we should take the same approach and expect nothing more than iterative improvement. Fine. Makes sense.
but did they ever win the tiger cup or audi cupthe only 'big' clubs that have been struggling in recent years are chelsea and united. both have still won more in the last 4 years than weve won in the last 30...so if thats struggling i wanna struggle too.
Early? Well let’s see…True supporters will back the manager this early into his tenure.
| 2009–2012 | Brisbane Roar |
|---|---|
| 2012–2013 | Melbourne Victory |
| 2013–2017 | Australia |
| 2018–2021 | Yokohama F. Marinos |
| 2021–2023 | Celtic |
You know he left all those clubs for good reasons and left them in a better state than when he arrived, Spurs and managing in the PL is the high plateau where you want to hang around not be moving on fromEarly? Well let’s see…
2009–2012 Brisbane Roar 2012–2013 Melbourne Victory 2013–2017 Australia 2018–2021 Yokohama F. Marinos 2021–2023 Celtic
Looks like he’s not stayed for longer than 3 seasons at a club. He’s already done one season at Spurs, which is 1/3 of his average span. Last season we were told the second season is where things fall into place. Yet some people would be satisfied only if we play slightly better than last season. Or some are still calling it early. Lol
Early? Well let’s see…
2009–2012 Brisbane Roar 2012–2013 Melbourne Victory 2013–2017 Australia 2018–2021 Yokohama F. Marinos 2021–2023 Celtic
Looks like he’s not stayed for longer than 3 seasons at a club. He’s already done one season at Spurs, which is 1/3 of his average span. Last season we were told the second season is where things fall into place. Yet some people would be satisfied only if we play slightly better than last season. Or some are still calling it early. Lol
He took over Yokohama when they were 5th, and led them to 12th, 1st, and 9th place finishes. Very debatable whether they were in a better position when he left than when he joined.You know he left all those clubs for good reasons and left them in a better state than when he arrived, Spurs and managing in the PL is the high plateau where you want to hang around not be moving on from
And throughout the season he gave off the impression that anything less than a title challenge next year and he'd be really unsatisfied. But like, does he realise the level of surgery this team needs to be anywhere close to competing with the likes of City, and across multiple competitions?
Because it comes across as delusional, especially when we're playing poorly the pitch. It'd be like David Moyes or Oliver Glasner prattling on about top 4 challenges - to anyone outside their clubs it just sounds laughable. Aiming high is fine, but be realistic about it.There are other completely valid criticisms of Ange but I just don’t get this one. We still see people reference the “it’s better to fail aiming high…” quote all the time, but then Ange doing just that is high being totally unrealistic.
Well that bit him in the arse, didn't it? He goes on and on about top 4 not being the goal, and then when the fans decided they agree and start cheering for City because they conclude that preventing Woolwich from winning the league is more important than some poxy 4th place trophy he suddenly gets all uppity about it.I think Ange is trying to establish an expectation both internally and externally, where there are no celebrations for fourth place finishes, something the vast majority of us have been saying for years.
Because it comes across as delusional, especially when we're playing poorly the pitch. It'd be like David Moyes or Oliver Glasner prattling on about top 4 challenges - to anyone outside their clubs it just sounds laughable. Aiming high is fine, but be realistic about it.
It was a unique situation that I think most people don’t want to be put into again. I don’t think that there is an issue or inconsistency with how Ange handled it. His entire point is that we should care more about our own success than the failure of another. He’s right and he also didn’t fully understand the context as well.Well that bit him in the arse, didn't it? He goes on and on about top 4 not being the goal, and then when the fans decided they agree and start cheering for City because they conclude that preventing Woolwich from winning the league is more important than some poxy 4th place trophy he suddenly gets all uppity about it.
Maybe if he'd been a bit more realistic about his burning desire for top 4 the fans might have valued it slightly more as a goal?
Good post, and I agree this is something that confuses me about Ange.
He has this odd confidence about him that doesn't seem to be based on what happens on the pitch. He was talking in the media like we were in a title challenge well into 2024 when it was blatant to anyone with eyes that we were miles off the top three, which then just ends up looking pretty stupid when you go on the sort of catastrophic run we did at the end of the season and bottle top 4 to Aston fucking Villa.
And throughout the season he gave off the impression that anything less than a title challenge next year and he'd be really unsatisfied. But like, does he realise the level of surgery this team needs to be anywhere close to competing with the likes of City, and across multiple competitions?
We'd need, minimum for the first team, a top class RW, #6, CB, possibly two CFs, and back ups in multiple areas, including LB, RB, #10, LW.
Now, I'm fine with the incremental approach as a fan; buying youngsters like Gray, Sarr, Bergvall, maybe a few punts on the likes of Doue, and then trying to bring through the likes of Moore and Phillips. It's not gonna win us a league title but it's satisfying to see as a fan, and you could see us gradually build over a number of years into a force.
But at the same time we have this manager that seems to think he's gonna be challenging Pep? It's delusional. Self belief is fine but this guy is properly detached from reality if he thinks this squad is anywhere close to a league title. I reckon we're a lot more likely to be 6th come the end of next season than 2nd or 3rd.
So I think it'll take at least a couple of windows, and then after that, it just depends on obviously the development of some of our players. If they develop quickly, then hopefully, it's just fine tuning in the next couple of windows, but it may mean you've still got significant work to do."