Ange is a philosophy manager more than a tactician. Sometimes he needs to be more pragmatic as the highline for highline sake is becoming a bit of a novelty. I still think the Chelsea loss last year with 9 men was a meme. I always thought if we retreated and sat back Chelsea would have felt the pressure big time, as the expectation was they had to win under those circumstances. They botched that many through balls being caught offside ect and missing sitters - they were nervous. Eventually they got the lead through a simple ball over the top to the wide player who squared it for a tap in. We should have leveraged the fact Chelsea were fumbling their attacks by not making it easier for them. Instead, we left all this space behind and said here we go lads, attack this space. I really think we could have won that game had we defended deep and patiently waited for a chance at the other end.
If you have a philosophy and wont to impose it on the other teams, you need to destroy them. However we dont have the quality to consistently impose ourselves on even mid teams, let alone the top teams.
There needs to be some tactical flexibility otherwise he will just be another manager who played good football but like Mourinho, Conte, Redknapp, Ramos; failed to make us proper contenders, or even outside contenders for the league title - which is was we were under Poch.
If you have a philosophy and wont to impose it on the other teams, you need to destroy them. However we dont have the quality to consistently impose ourselves on even mid teams, let alone the top teams.
There needs to be some tactical flexibility otherwise he will just be another manager who played good football but like Mourinho, Conte, Redknapp, Ramos; failed to make us proper contenders, or even outside contenders for the league title - which is was we were under Poch.