As others have said, it was
clearly a tongue in cheek comment. You see, there’s this quirk with the English language where you can express things in a way intended not to be taken 100%literally, for instance to add emphasis or for humorous effect.
It’s like if I said, “Man, Eric Dier is the
worst defender in the history of the Premier League” I’m probably aware that this statement wouldn’t stand up to any serious scrutiny, however in that moment I’ve expressed that I think Dier’s a bit shit.
So no, Ange wasn’t positing a serious argument that assists are the most meaningless statistic out of all the statistics because he’s given it a lot of thought and that’s the conclusion he’s come to. It was a throwaway, tongue in cheek comment with a hint of truth to set up what he said next, which was that Dane’s assist was a good one.
Some of you guys man, yeesh.