• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 73 64.6%
  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.4%

  • Total voters
    113
My issue with xG is that I don’t know the input for the metric so I can’t really say what it’s good for and not good for. Especially in small sample sizes.

But it’s a predictive metric so it will have been built/tested etc enough to be accepted by the entire football analytics community. The issue is how it’s used, not the metric itself.

If xG says that it gives 0.5 xG for a chance that’s because over a large enough sample size 50/100 times that chance results in a goal. That’s all it says and that’s all it can be used for. It gives you questions not answers.

I don’t know if it takes into account left or right footed chance for a right footed player, I don’t know if it takes into account form of the player shooting, I don’t know if it takes into account the quality of the GK…, there is countless other bits of missing context that people fail to consider when using it as a single game answer for why a game was won or lost.


And to be clear, it’s only ever used for single games in data editorial in the media. No serious analyst for a team should be quoting it as an answer for why a game was good/bad for a team.
The free models that are available on the internet definitely don't afaik. Think the context you mentioned and more will definitely be taken into account by clubs.
 
Son is an outlier in the data set for xG.

Outliers don’t take anything away from the predictive nature of a data metric. I don’t mean to be rude here but either you know that, or you might be better reading about data analysis from a better source than me on TFC.

No, he is not.

There are players who are more clinical than average (outperforming xG) and players who are less clinical then average (underperforming xG).
 
The free models that are available on the internet definitely don't afaik. Think the context you mentioned and more will definitely be taken into account by clubs.
Have you found an actual breakdown of the input for xG. Opta created and everyone tweaks around it but Opta only ever released the marketing blurb to the public. I’m sure clubs and analyst training courses have the actúa metric but without seeing it, we are just guessing
 
Have you found an actual breakdown of the input for xG. Opta created and everyone tweaks around it but Opta only ever released the marketing blurb to the public. I’m sure clubs and analyst training courses have the actúa metric but without seeing it, we are just guessing
What can be found online in terms of the models is basically stuff like angle, pressure, body part, attack situation etc.

I'm sure clubs, especially switched on ones, will have stuff about footedness, the strength of the opposing GK, game state etc but that's just an educated guess tbh.
 
What can be found online in terms of the models is basically stuff like angle, pressure, body part, attack situation etc.

I'm sure clubs, especially switched on ones, will have stuff about footedness, the strength of the opposing GK, game state etc but that's just an educated guess tbh.
I’ve seen that stuff in the blurb as well but never seen the actual formula to know exactly what goes into it.

Most of us basically eating processed food with no ingredients list.

Definitely agree that big clubs will have their own analytics dept that tweak the metric for the context that matters to them. Could be footedness but maybe even stuff like their own areas of the pitch they prefer to force teams to attack from, number of actions needed to create the chance, or whatever their defensive/offensive structures are designed around.
 
He earned a stay of execution on Saturday.
But he has 2 more games coming up where he needs to win.

He needs to put on a good show in the ropey league as I don't believe we've played well in a single cup game to date? (Fulham, Burnley, City, Coventry)
Then, IMO, he needs to go to OT and win. In years gone by, I think that statement would be preposterous. But in 2024, there isn't much between the teams. There is no reason we can't go there and win for the first time in a few seasons other than shitting the bed for no good reason.


For me, I'm not going to spend the next 6 days arguing against Ange.
Let's see what we do in these 2 upcoming games.
 
Not on purpose but they set themselves up to counter our thin defence when we've been attacking and lose the ball.
Why would teams let's us 'press them' lol. I've seen no one claim that. People making up their own arguments. Arteta did not contest possession with us in the middle third and he isn't the first to do it, because a few coaches have realised if they don't get drawn to our underlapping fullbacks, stay compact and disciplined we just recycle the ball in front them for huge chunks of time.
 
Good performance the other day. But I think we need to pump the brakes a little on this supposed new dawn under Ange. Memories are short, the Coventry performance was one of the worst Spurs games I've ever seen. We've still lost 7 of our last 12 in the league, and won 2 games away in the whole of 2024. I need to see us perform well and win away against a top half side, three points at Old Trafford would go a long way to silencing the doubters.
when did you start supporting - must have been during Ryan Masons last interim manager stint?
 
Why would teams let's us 'press them' lol. I've seen no one claim that. People making up their own arguments. Arteta did not contest possession with us in the middle third and he isn't the first to do it, because a few coaches have realised if they don't get drawn to our underlapping fullbacks, stay compact and disciplined we just recycle the ball in front them for huge chunks of time.
Yeah the best way to beat us is to hold back and attack at the key moments.
 
Why would teams let's us 'press them' lol. I've seen no one claim that. People making up their own arguments. Arteta did not contest possession with us in the middle third and he isn't the first to do it, because a few coaches have realised if they don't get drawn to our underlapping fullbacks, stay compact and disciplined we just recycle the ball in front them for huge chunks of time.
We can't press a team into mistakes if we already have the ball.
Pressing and possession are unrelated.
I bet we won far more presses against Brentford than Woolwich and Leicester. Possibly even Newcastle. Because against Brentford, they had a lot more of the ball in order for us to press than the other 3.

That's the difference between giving up possession and having the ball taken off you.
 
Yeah the best way to beat us is to hold back and attack at the key moments.
It’s also the only way because we are pressing that well atm that we don’t give teams much choice. I guess City and Liverpool will be a huge test of that to see if we can press them as well, or they dominate us.

Not on purpose but they set themselves up to counter our thin defence when we've been attacking and lose the ball.

Set themselves up or work on that because it’s the only way they can is up for debate. Brentford had a go at us and pressed back more.

Either way, have we actually conceded a goal on the counter yet? 1 goal from set pieces as well after playing Dyche, woolwich and Brentford, 3 of the best in the prem.

It will never be perfect but there’s definitely signs of progress on the Achilles heels of last season
 
Why would teams let's us 'press them' lol. I've seen no one claim that. People making up their own arguments. Arteta did not contest possession with us in the middle third and he isn't the first to do it, because a few coaches have realised if they don't get drawn to our underlapping fullbacks, stay compact and disciplined we just recycle the ball in front them for huge chunks of time.
People have absolutely been claiming that teams let us have the ball,

How are we supposed to have the ball if we don’t win it back from them?

Or you are straight face trying to claim that our possession dominance isn’t because of our press but because teams just pass us the ball so they can sit deep and counter ? 🤣🤣
 
Back
Top