We aren't talking about the season as a whole are we? We are discussing this specific Press conference after a game where Spurs had more than half their team out. Postecoglou hasn't brought up injuries once this season - he did this time. When:
Vicario
Romero
Van Den Ven
Bentancur
Odobert
Richarlison
Moore
Solanke
Were all unavailable due to injury, illness or suspension.
So let's not try and pretend you're not shifting the goalposts just because you were called out for an overwrought hysterical reaction to what was a perfectly normal and rational answer by any manager in this type of situation.
What on earth? How's his presser come "at the expense of the club"

He's legiimately in the middle of an injury crisis. Any manager ever would say the same. Blimey!
I'm framing your criticism in this specific instance as overwrought, hysterical and lacking any sort of coherence whatsoever.
I have no problem with you wanting Ange Out or not thinking his results are good enough etc etc... He's lost football games. He's lost your trust. Fine. What I responded to was the ridiculous essay you wrote criticising his Presser like it was a personal affront to you.
And you're still acting like he personally took a dump in your cornflakes and told you to thank him for it!
He just pointed out we have loads of injuries - when we do, indeed, have loads of injuries. Any manager would do the same - especially when they are under pressure for their jobs. Chill the fuck out. He isn't rogering your sister!
What "level of protection" ffs

He's 18 months into his contract.
Some people are just fucking bored of the constant sacking of managers - with no improvement from one to the next and none of whom given even a minimum amount of time to build. It's not "defending the indefensible" - it's trying to be a normal club for once. We aren't in a relegation fight and, as far as we know, he hasn't lost the dressing room.
Conte, Mourinho, Poch, AVB, Redknapp, Jol... Sack after sack after sack. It's FUCKING BORING
I appreciate your passion for defending Postecoglou, but letās not overlook some glaring issues here. Iāve supported Spurs for nearly 40 years, through ups and downs, and my critique isnāt born out of āhysteriaā or personal affrontāitās rooted in frustration at the trajectory of the club under Angeās management and his previous attitude toward supporters and the history with our rivals.
Firstly, the injuries listed are unfortunate but hardly unprecedented for a top-flight football team during a grueling season; most teams contend with similar challenges, yet manage to avoid trotting them out as an excuse every time results don't go their way. Ange has conveniently decided to highlight injuries in this specific press conference, despite having had plenty of opportunities earlier this season when the same "patterns of play" were evident with a largely healthy squad.
Moreover, letās dissect the claim of "more than half the team out." Several of the players mentioned, like Richarlison, haven't been consistent starters or game-changers even when fit. Others, like Odobert, barely feature in discussions of our core squad depth. This selective framing seems more like an exercise in sympathy generation than an accurate reflection of our actual capabilities.
Calling out deflection isnāt āshifting goalpostsā either mateāitās recognizing a repeated pattern. Angeās response wasnāt rational; it was a calculated move to redirect criticism away from his tactical missteps. Managers earn their keep by adapting under adversity, not by invoking laundry lists of absentees as a shield against scrutiny.
What's funny is, you accuse me of shifting goalposts, but your argument does exactly that. This isnāt about one press conference or one gameāitās about a broader pattern of deflection and underperformance.
Calling me āoverwroughtā or suggesting I feel personally attacked doesnāt invalidate my points; it just attempts to diminish them without engaging substantively.
Your nostalgia for managerial stability is noted and shared actually, I agree with you on this, but it doesnāt excuse Angeās failures imo; Stability is meaningless if itās built on mediocrity; Conte, Mourinho, and even Poch werenāt perfect, but they had far more justification for their stature than Angeāa journeyman with a middling CV and a tendency to court excuses when under pressure.
The constant āsacking managers is boringā argument holds no weight when the managers being defended arenāt delivering and in the case of Ange, taking us backwards.
As someone who has spent decades supporting this club, I find it galling to see the manager prioritize self-preservation over acknowledging legitimate concerns, this is an annoyance for me and something that I don't think should be tolerated, the club should always come first.
Finally, I care so deeply because this club deserves better. Iām not interested in indulging a manager who has already alienated sections of the fanbase, delivered underwhelming results, and shown little capacity for meaningful adaptation due to his undeserved ego. Spurs should aspire to more than simply avoiding a midtable scrapāwe should demand accountability and ambition from everyone involved.
If Ange wants to stay and succeed, he needs to stop deflecting and start delivering.
So TLDR, if Iām guilty of calling out a manager who spends more time defending his shortcomings than fixing them, Iāll wear that badge proudly. Spurs deserve better than excuses masquerading as explanations.