They were inconsistent in the league for a while but his style of play was noticeable immediately and he took them to a European final in his first season. They also showed a constant if times inconsistent upward trend of improvement. That showed everyone pretty early on, he was going to be a special manager for them.
When a manager takes over a club I always look for constant improvement. I would much rather a manager take 12/27 in his first 9 games, but show constant improvement. Rather than win his first 9 games but then get worse and worse.
Only one of those above shows a manager is improving the team, and not just relying on initial new manager bounce.
It's why Amorim, well nobody should be getting carried away and calling him a flop now. Of course at some point he will need to show improvement, but it's far too early yet. That said, there is always the need for any manager to get enough results to keep their job, enough to give them the time to improve the team. You can't just keep losing and then say you need time, it doesn't work like that. That is why doing well in another competition, like a cup final, can buy you more time too. Klopp did that, Arteta won a cup. Again Ange did neither.
We only did well in those first ten games under Ange because his tactics surprised teams. As soon as teams wised up, our results got worse and it’s continued in the same vein because he just won’t change and we’ve been playing the same way since. When the injured players come back nothing will change and it will be the same. It’s why I struggle to take those defending him seriously, a lack of acknowledgment that that’s just who we are mate.