Frankly, it was the right decision to sack him when we did. The real mistake was not backing him when he needed it.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Management Ange Postecoglou
- Thread starter The Fighting Cock
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Frankly, it was the right decision to sack him when we did. The real mistake was not backing him when he needed it.
Even the great Graham Roberts has said his football is not sustainable. We need a player like him in team. Barnstorming runs from back if we were in the shit or needed a winner.
His kids are grown men. Postecoglou is close to retirement age, not reproductive age
The error is not mine squire.
My observations were along the lines of what you have pointed out.
To have children in the under 8's Ange would need to have knocked someone up since he was 51.
He'd have needed a keen reverse cow girl of child bearing age in my opinion.
Yeah what a legend
Saw a bit of wearetottenhamtv analysing ange optus interview. Not really my bag we are Tottenham tv but some of the stuff ange mentioned about bad preparation for season was ridiculous. 5m a year hes on plus other club members are accountable for preparing so bad. Amateurish tbh.
And has the gall to say how well he did getting 5th last season after we were 8th the season before. Like some great rescue act.
Would you hire a League One manager? If not why would you hire a coach like her who has only coached football at a lower standard of play than Leyton Orient??Nuno Espirito Santo had actually had real jobs before Spurs like Conte Jose is just finished. That people in the fan base and worse at the club thought Ange was of the same level tells you a lot. Also let's not exclude the 'Journalists' the Pitt-Brookes, Mokbel's, Winters. The HIPSTERS. THEY NEVER QUESTION THE APPOINTMENT NOT ONE. They were drinking the global champagne, there's no difference at all right? "Liberté, égalité, fraternité" Your only being a troglodyte if you don't think Emma Hayes deserves a crack at the Spurs job look at her CV...
View: https://x.com/JackPittBrooke/status/1907893559048523783?t=4Z06CxjJBdhFXEtE4heXkA&s=19
Don't even care if we turn the game around, this is a sackable offence on its own.
Tinpot cunt
na, he clearly knows what hes doing tho.....
Only lost by one goal
Which doesn't count as a loss
The journos need to proper wind him up after this one. Hope they ask about the ear cupping, we could get some gold soundbites from the fat bastard.
Could this be his Conte after Southampton moment?
wE OnlY loST bY oNe GOaL
Best post tonight. Always been the same. I remember Redknapp getting Saha and Nelson on free's in the January window when I fully believe we could have really started pushing towards a title run.
Until people realise the ownership is 100% the problem and always will be until removed we're absolutely doomed.