• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Manager Ange Postecoglou

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Was sacking Ange a good idea?

  • Yes, I think it was a good idea.

    Votes: 73 64.6%
  • No, I think it was a bad idea.

    Votes: 40 35.4%

  • Total voters
    113
I think he’d do alright. If anything I’m blasé about it. But 100% looking forward to the meltdown whatever happens.
Interesting to know why you think he will do alright and are biased about it... I have asked a few other Frank In forum members but they haven't been able to substantiate anything that would point to Frank being the right man. Like you said though, whoever we pick (assuming it won't be Ancelotti) is not going to be universally liked and there will be a group (me included if it's a mid table PL clogger) who will start hounding the new manager out the door before a ball has been kicked.
 
So Spurs go through a series of managers searching for a long awaited manager to win a cup.

Manager achieves cup success and they sack him.

What does that even mean for future managers? Win us champions league and you still face the sack? Finish top 4 trophyless and still face the sack?

There needs to be stability. Back your managers if they can bring you success.
 
Interesting to know why you think he will do alright and are biased about it... I have asked a few other Frank In forum members but they haven't been able to substantiate anything that would point to Frank being the right man. Like you said though, whoever we pick (assuming it won't be Ancelotti) is not going to be universally liked and there will be a group (me included if it's a mid table PL clogger) who will start hounding the new manager out the door before a ball has been kicked.
tbh, while there are better coaches than Frank, I honestly think if you spend some time listening to Frank talk about football it is impossible not to conclude that the man has a far more nuanced, detailed and sophisticated approach to tactics than does Ange. He has also, if anything, somewhat overachieved at Brentford. Ange has not overachieved at Tottenham, despite EL.
 
Looking at recent reactions of some Spurs related accounts at X that had some insights from the club in the past - seems indeed he might be gone. Thank fuck if its true.

And hopefully cultists that are following Ange and not Spurs - will fuck off as well.
 
So Spurs go through a series of managers searching for a long awaited manager to win a cup.

Manager achieves cup success and they sack him.

What does that even mean for future managers? Win us champions league and you still face the sack? Finish top 4 trophyless and still face the sack?

There needs to be stability. Back your managers if they can bring you success.
It's a recognition that you have to calibrate your assessment based on all the competitive games he's played, the standard of competition, and the direction of travel.

The trophy is great yes. But it's part of the story. It does not mean we will win another one next year. It does not mean our league form will magically improve dramatically.
 
I’m not Ange In but I can’t see the point at this time of losing him and replacing him with a middle level manager who has never won anything.
Having said that, if he’s in I suspect he’ll be out by Xmas.
 
tbh, while there are better coaches than Frank, I honestly think if you spend some time listening to Frank talk about football it is impossible not to conclude that the man has a far more nuanced, detailed and sophisticated approach to tactics than does Ange. He has also, if anything, somewhat overachieved at Brentford. Ange has not overachieved at Tottenham, despite EL.
Then we disagree. I think it is very possible to conclude Frank is a bigger chancer than Ange. You see, I have listened to Frank plenty and you're right, he comes across as someone with an air of football philosopher about him. However, when you get by the prancing he's not actually saying much at all or at least not anything I couldn't conclude myself. Having a nuanced, detailed and sophisticated approach to tactics does not make you a better manager (see Harry Redknapp). Can he motivate, will his players run through walls for him, does he feel the game and know when to make changes, can he win when it matters. All of these things are not something I am saying Ange has by the way. Also, I don't think he has overachieved at Brentford at all. They are exactly where they should be... slap bang in the middle of the PL. If anything he should have at least kicked on by now and got them into Conference League.
 
So Spurs go through a series of managers searching for a long awaited manager to win a cup.

Manager achieves cup success and they sack him.

What does that even mean for future managers? Win us champions league and you still face the sack? Finish top 4 trophyless and still face the sack?

There needs to be stability. Back your managers if they can bring you success.

If we had finished in the top half, Ange wouldn't be getting sacked.

A serious club cannot finish 17th with 38 points and point to a lesser trophy like the Europa League as a reason to ignore the disgusting performance in the league. That is pure West Ham, small-time mentality.

If we want to have a team that justifies a £1600 season ticket, we need a different manager (along with some top signings). The best way to bring success is to be a good team, not a shit one.
 
I would like to see Ange go , but not in the shoddy classless way it is being done. Even if he stays it’s still been done in a shoddy manner. Hopefully if he gets the sack he throws Levy under the bus .

Clearly I do not mean literally throw him under the bus , I know how sensitive his defence force can get . So no righteous indignation please about it being disgusting advocating for the assassination of our dear leader .
 
If we had finished in the top half, Ange wouldn't be getting sacked.

A serious club cannot finish 17th with 38 points and point to a lesser trophy like the Europa League as a reason to ignore the disgusting performance in the league. That is pure West Ham, small-time mentality.

If we want to have a team that justifies a £1600 season ticket, we need a different manager (along with some top signings). The best way to bring success it to be a good team, not a shit one.
Good post!

How some can’t see that is beyond me!
 
Do you know how fucking insane it is to be going on a Tottenham Hotspur forum as a Celtic fan passionately defending a manager who left you two fucking years ago? He's been gone for as long as he was there. Are you really trying to say that your weird obsession with the fortunes of one of your former managers is grounds to make you a better Spurs fan, than actual Spurs fans? You've got more front than Brighton Pier slagging anyone off for defending Poch, a former Tottenham manager, on a Tottenham Forum, when you're on here cosplaying as a Spurs fan to stan for Ange the same way 13 year old girls do for Taylor Swift...
Nearly 500 posts on a different club's forum just because a manager who spent 2 years at your club is now there and you think he might need defending from horrible online haters. Fucking embarrassing.
By the way, Poch took a side that had only twice before qualified for the Champions League since it was reformatted from the European cup to a final inside 5 years, and a team that hadn't finished in the top 3 since 1992, to three consecutive top three finishes. Ange took a side that hadn't finished outside the top 10 since 2007/08 (11th) to it's lowest finish in 48 years. To even pretend they operate in the same stratosphere when it comes to league competency is completely churlish.

These nutters and the recently brainwashed existing Spurs fans are gonna be a problem for years.
The man literally has a cult. It's insane. The whole thing is incomprehensible to a normal, sane person.
 
Harry Redknap on Talksport this morning, reckons the longer the silence from Spurs, the more worrying it is for Postecoglou (this is another response from me to those who continue to claim that Spurs don't need to say anything if The Post is staying in post).

In my opinion, Redknap knows how these things work.
 
Ange and his starting 11 were good enough to beat any team in the PL.

Hahahahahhaa

- Has never beaten Woolwich
- Has never beaten Chelsea
- Has one pointless win in a first leg of a cup competition over Liverpool before losing the overall tie 4-1. One league win over them when they were down to 9, otherwise they have shredded us repeatedly.

‘we can beat anyone’ is such a pointless statement lol, almost every prem team has some scalps against the big teams. Our big game record under him is absolutely mediocre and we lose far more than we win.
 
So Spurs go through a series of managers searching for a long awaited manager to win a cup.

Manager achieves cup success and they sack him.

What does that even mean for future managers? Win us champions league and you still face the sack? Finish top 4 trophyless and still face the sack?

There needs to be stability. Back your managers if they can bring you success.
finish on 38 points. get the sack. no serious club keeps the manager on after that points haul
 
So Spurs go through a series of managers searching for a long awaited manager to win a cup.

Manager achieves cup success and they sack him.

What does that even mean for future managers? Win us champions league and you still face the sack? Finish top 4 trophyless and still face the sack?

There needs to be stability. Back your managers if they can bring you success.

nah maybe at a serious club, but if we finished 4th without a trophy for the next 8 years that would be a dream from Daniel , and some of fans too no doubt
 
Interesting to know why you think he will do alright and are biased about it... I have asked a few other Frank In forum members but they haven't been able to substantiate anything that would point to Frank being the right man. Like you said though, whoever we pick (assuming it won't be Ancelotti) is not going to be universally liked and there will be a group (me included if it's a mid table PL clogger) who will start hounding the new manager out the door before a ball has been kicked.

https://thefightingcock.co.uk/forum/threads/ange-postecoglou.48121/page-4410#post-4963658

People will play the "Levy card" with it, but the answer is to find someone who can look at the current squad and make a functional XI out of them. That's not absurd to expect, and arguably what made Redknapp so successful here.
That's also the reason why I can't look past Thomas Frank. He's adapted the team from an attacking dominant Championship to being a pragmatic PL side that succeeded where Kompany's Burnley did not. He has lost (arguably) the best players each year and adapted more. This last season he adapted them again. We really shouldn't be looking for a manager with a Plan A or B, but simply a manager with the ability to put a good side out with the aim to win the match with the players available. I don't think that automatically means sacrificing style either - he's had near 40 PL goals between two of his forwards.
 
Ange deserves huge credit for getting us over the line in the EL but the way some are denigrating previous managers for losing finals is absurd.

Redknapp lost a cup final to Ferguson’s United. Poch lost a CL final to peak Klopp Liverpool and a league cup final to title-winning Chelsea. Mason lost a cup final to peak Pep City. Yes we failed to produce a miracle on those occasions but our opponents were all vastly superior to us.

Our opponent in the EL final was the first final in my time supporting the club where we were not outmatched on paper. All credit to Ange for winning the game on the pitch but anyone throwing shade at Poch by comparison for not winning a game against the greatest Liverpool team of all time just looks foolish. The final Ange had to play was the least challenging one we’ve had in decades.

The Poch final - the performance was terrible - sure they were the better team but it was just a terrible managerial performance from him - lacked any inspiration, and ideas - nothing... This was quite consistent from him in semi-finals and finals..... its ok to lose if it feels like we're actually competing, I guess....

Also, the Chelsea game was a semi-final vs a team we had beaten 2-0 a couple of months earlier - he played Son WB weirdly and started Walker on the bench.
 
It's the direct opposite of Spursy, isn't it?

Rather than our poor luck showing up at the most critical time, we have a stroke of luck at the critical moment.

Rather than losing on an OG, we win by one. Instead of being doomed by our luck we're saved by it for once.

Rather than losing to a very beatable team by failing to take chances, we fail to take those chances but win anyway.

Instead of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, we latched on and ground one out.

Instead of going into a shell and then bottling a lead, we went into a shell and it worked.

Down is up, up is down

The Spursy thing here is that it could well mean another season of Ange making us even worse.
 
Back
Top