Exactly
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Exactly
Having a constant shit show in front of him hasnt helped the ladHorrendous performance - the stuff of nightmares really.
Very, very raw keeper with a shitload to learn and improve on.
And thats from been coached by sub standard coaches. Clear as dayYeah, looked way more composed. Actually came and caught crosses and pinged some passes into feet. Now he’s flapping and punching at crosses and hesitant with the ball at his feet.
So hes shit now after been really good sunday.At fault for two goals tonight - his error game ratio is insanely bad .
Not his fault - but given our requirements he seems like an awful signing.
But hey - we were looking of a keeper who was good with his feet - to fit our system.![]()
Apart from the Utd game no one thought he was shit - he used to get motmot.
I think we were right to sign someone in January just not Kinsky.
If Kinsky is good - I would not like to see what a bad keeper looks like
Guy's just determined that Kinsky is a failure so he can pin a dud on the owners.
Same as his hate-boner for Solanke.
Barely see a post from him on any other subject.
What exactly are you expecting from a young back-up goalkeeper brought in to develop and eventually challenge? How many of those were available on the market who’d be willing to come?I just tell it as I see it.
The whole Kinsky can replace Vicario was crazy.
I don't know if Kinsky will be shit - but I can't pretend like others - that he has been good or even mediocre.
It's a new signing bias - people want him yo be good- so pretend he is.
Not dismilar to Solanke - where he has not been at all shit - but nowhere near as good as some think.
Should we just pretend Kinsky has been good - and ignre all the mistakes?
I would like to know why they signed him - knowing he was coming straight in.
Did anyone go and see him play?
Someone on here said - even on his highlight reel - he spilt shots.
It could be down to Ange being daft enough to ignore handling- and focus on a keeper whohe thinks is good with his feet
What exactly are you expecting from a young back-up goalkeeper brought in to develop and eventually challenge? How many of those were available on the market who’d be willing to come?
Yes, obviously his lack of experience and flaws are being exposed, but there are not many 21-year-old keepers playing in the top five leagues full stop.
He came into difficult situation and has done as well as could be expected by anyone reasonable.
You’re obviously dug in so are gonna attribute blame to him for lots of goals. I would only really say the Trossard one was a clanger. Even the penalty last night, I think he had to come for it, but he’s not used to players as quick and powerful as Nunez. That’s experience and learning.I was not expecting or hoping we would sign a keeper who will cost us so many goals?
If anyone said - hey let's sign this keeper we will put him straight in - he will cost us lots of goals - but that is not important .
Would anyone have thought - it was a good idea?
And why do you think he will be a good keeper and shows potential - based on what?
What would a keeper who did not show potential look like.
As for being difficult to find a good back up keeper in Jan - I completely agree with you there.
I just tell it as I see it.
The whole Kinsky can replace Vicario was crazy.
I don't know if Kinsky will be shit - but I can't pretend like others - that he has been good or even mediocre.
It's a new signing bias - people want him yo be good- so pretend he is.
Not dismilar to Solanke - where he has not been at all shit - but nowhere near as good as some think.
Should we just pretend Kinsky has been good - and ignre all the mistakes?
I would like to know why they signed him - knowing he was coming straight in.
Did anyone go and see him play?
Someone on here said - even on his highlight reel - he spilt shots.
It could be down to Ange being daft enough to ignore handling- and focus on a keeper whohe thinks is good with his feet
Vic gets the trosdard goalFeel bad for Vic saying he is done at No1. Reckon Vic saves the first shot (90% confidence he does) and very very confident he gets to the ball before kinsky for the penalty! Vic has his faults, but shot stopping and behing first to the ball isn’t one of them! Think we see him in the net against villa and likely in every game after that
If your takes were a goalkeeper they’d be playing on Hackney marshes in an over 40s league so I don’t think you should be commenting on the elite game.Vic gets the trosdard goal
Vic gets gapko goal
Vic gets to ball and no pen
Taking away from the fact he’s a young kid in a new country who’s level of opponent is beyond anything he’s encountered …….. he’s been absolutely useless debut aside
Like costing you games useless