A joy to watch yesterday.
So Dembele-esq in how players bounce off him!
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Everton at home were worse.Think you have to take the opposition into account really, it was impressive but Utd were dogshit, I honestly don't think we'll have an easier match across 90 mins this season.
Everton at home were worse.
They aren’t great but had an identical record to us coming in and winning at OT is never easy.
I’m not getting carried away at all but that was some display from Kulusevski. 9 chances created in the game and it really wouldn’t have been freakish if he’d finished the game with a goal and 3 assists.
I know Palmer just scored 4 goals but this is honestly one of the best individual performances of the season across the league.
From a Spurs perspective it’s up there with Kane away at City imo
Kane was better but this was comparable.That's fine but I wouldn't compare this to Kane away at Man City, that was my point.
And Everton were better than Utd, that's how bad they were!
I think there’s a lot of premature sucking off of each other. I get it, the Kulu fanboys have had to wait two years for a genuine MoTm type performance, so you want to party. But let’s keep some perspective. He was really good, I was one of the 1st to come in and say man of the match well played. But that game is a unicorn where he’s concerned. A massive outlier.
Quoting chances and key passes is bogus. They mean very little as a qualitative measurement. Playing 8/10 for an incredibly attacking team will influence that hugely. Maddison’s XA is higher than Kulusevski’s for the season still, and of Kulusevski’s 1.98 XA, 1.45 of it came in that one game against a shit Utd.
What was good was that Kulusevski was much more involved in the game yesterday and actually created tangible stuff. The back flick was still unnecessary vanity though, and made it harder for Maddison to collect the ball and as a consequence made the chance harder than if Kulusevski had just played a simple wall pass at the correct pace. And he also chose to shoot straight at the defender when we had a 2v1 situation to his left. These things were at 1-0 when the game was not ours.
He did also play a fantastic ball to put Werner away (the second one). And was involved in lots of good stuff.
More good please, less stupid tricks.
Let’s just see him do this consistently for a bunch of games. I don’t even care if he doesn’t score or make an assist every game if he’s just more involved and making better decisions and executions in the buildup that will impress me.
Also this strange claim that he’s got a fabulous engine. I just don’t get this. His engine is no better than anyone else is in that team we have people like Porro and Udogie running up and down the pitch all day long from to end. Maddison covers way more ground, and sees way more ball. Kulusevski isn’t always the quickest to get back. We play an extremely demanding brand of football, and athleticism is a minimum requirement, and nearly all our players show this, most as much if not more than Kulusevski.
Let’s just keep it real. Good game, needs to do it most weeks. Not once.
I think there’s a lot of premature sucking off of each other. I get it, the Kulu fanboys have had to wait two years for a genuine MoTm type performance, so you want to party. But let’s keep some perspective. He was really good, I was one of the 1st to come in and say man of the match well played. But that game is a unicorn where he’s concerned. A massive outlier.
Quoting chances and key passes is bogus. They mean very little as a qualitative measurement. Playing 8/10 for an incredibly attacking team will influence that hugely. Maddison’s XA is higher than Kulusevski’s for the season still, and of Kulusevski’s 1.98 XA, 1.45 of it came in that one game against a shit Utd. Which begs the valid question, where was kulusevski the rest of the games when we needed him. Against tougher opponents like Arse, Newcastle?
What was good was that Kulusevski was much more involved in the game yesterday and actually created tangible stuff. The back flick was still unnecessary vanity though, and made it harder for Maddison to collect the ball and as a consequence made the chance harder than if Kulusevski had just played a simple wall pass at the correct pace. And he also chose to shoot straight at the defender when we had a 2v1 situation to his left. These things were at 1-0 when the game was not ours.
He did also play a fantastic ball to put Werner away (the second one). And was involved in lots of good stuff.
More good please, less stupid tricks.
Let’s just see him do this consistently for a bunch of games. I don’t even care if he doesn’t score or make an assist every game if he’s just more involved and making better decisions and executions in the buildup that will impress me.
Also this strange claim that he’s got a fabulous engine. I just don’t get this. His engine is no better than anyone else is in that team we have people like Porro and Udogie running up and down the pitch all day long from to end. Maddison covers way more ground, and sees way more ball. Kulusevski isn’t always the quickest to get back. We play an extremely demanding brand of football, and athleticism is a minimum requirement, and nearly all our players show this, most as much if not more than Kulusevski.
Let’s just keep it real. Good game, needs to do it most weeks. Not once.
It was his best game for us, by some distance.I know Palmer just scored 4 goals but this is honestly one of the best individual performances of the season across the league.
From a Spurs perspective it’s up there with Kane away at City imo