No he's staying with the Gooners.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Management ENIC
- Thread starter The Fighting Cock
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Classic Spurs move to go for him next summer when his value will be down because of it all though. I agree, he's a great player. I would be more than happy with him.
His value will be down this summer, might not be next
Common sense to move for him next Summer, this whole season is a write off for him.
Yeah nobody is buying him now and the reduction in cost would surely not be worth it. Goodness knows what player you are getting back the other side of his ban. He might be fighting more than gambling demons.
Alternatively he could be a fully motivated, injury free beast when he returns
I’m not sure he has gambling demons. I
Understand a lot of the bets were historic and low level
If Levy really wants Toney he will wait, he'll either ask Ange to have Scarlett or Parrott cover for Kane or get some donkey on loan.
That’s what I am thinking. Watkins has good pace, makes good runs & a good finisher. But Toney is a better all rounder & will have a bigger impact. Also good pen taker like kane. Shame about the gambling. Especially as the league heavily promotes it, there is no escaping it.
Seems like a classic levy opportunist signing.
Another good option. I am yet to decide on whether we should cash in on Kane or get 1 more year out of him. Or what levy favours?
Depends on a few things. The club who makes the bid, the price and any indications from Kane that he might sign a new deal or not
Bayern for 100M is v different to Chelsea at 100M
Sounds about right.
Now do:
City without Haaland
Man U without Rashford
Woolwich without Saka
Liverpool without Salah
Newcastle without Wilson
All still above us sadly
Well, these guys are actually a bunch of crooks...imagine selling your club to this lot...
josimarfootball.com
The 777 football mystery - josimarfootball.com
Multiple club-owner 777 – a US private investors group – has a patchy record in honouring its financial commitments and is the subject of several court actions in the USA. So who are they, and where does the money come from?
josimarfootball.com
Yeah if Kane wants to stay then that’s a no brainer! But unlikely! Enic & levy have made sure of that.
If he wants to go then Abroad seems the best option but usually means less £££.
I read today Bayern are going to make a second bid of 80m + add ons. That’s pretty fair given his age & only a year left.
All still above us sadly
Makes sense, but they would all be finishing much lower than they had I'm sure.
I personally don't think these kinds of 'stats' mean anything at all and are not looked at by anyone seriously trying to analyse anything about how a team performs.
They have ambition so they will just buy a replacement
It’s more that you would expect top 4 for most of them without the players you mention. We struggled for 8th with Kane scoring 31. I get your point but think it’s very different. I think we are more over reliant on kane than the others are for there players you mentioned. I also think he is our only really good player so You say much lower. How much lower do u think city finish without halaand?